AMARCHAND S/O KALYANMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-03. AMARCHAND S/O KALYANMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:49740] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8053/2022 1. Amarchand S/o Kalyanmal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S. Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Udaiveer S/o Shyodas, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S. Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 3. Kaluram S/o Shri Ramjilal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S. Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Karan Singh S/o Shyodas, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S. Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 5. Jeetmal S/o Modulal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Maheli, Police Station Rawajna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 6. Shaitan @ Vishal S/o Shri Bhagchand, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kabir Kuti, Ramganjmandi, P. S. Ramganjmandi, District Kota 7. Smt. Anita Bai W/o Shri Amarchand, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S. Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 8. Smt. Kirta Bai W/o Shri Sanjay, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jeenapur, P. S.
Rawajnadungar, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through P. p. 2. Manoj Kumar Berwal S/o Shri Gordhan, Aged About 42 Years, At Present Police Inspector, SHO P. S. Ramganjmandi, District Kota Rural ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/12/2024 [2024:RJ-JP:49740] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8053/2022] 1. This criminal misc. petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defects. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter and they have lost interest in pursuing this matter. 3. In view of the above, the criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Stay application and all other application(s), pending, if any, also stand dismissed. 5.
However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this criminal misc. petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /362
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.