PRAMOD TRIVEDI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. PRAMOD TRIVEDI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1113 of 2024 BETWEEN:- PRAMOD TRIVEDI S/O SHRI MAHESHCHANDRA TRIVEDI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE D-411, COSMOS CITY BICHOLI MARDANA, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI SHUBHAM SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR M. P. STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD 26 ARERA HILLS KISAN BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. JOINT DIRECTOR M. P. STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE 28 BHARATPURI UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SECRETARY KRISHI UPAJ MANDI BARNAGAR UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY MS. HARSHLATA SONI, P. L. /G. A.
) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER 1 ] This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- Signature Not Verified Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 02-02-2024 17:44:29 "It is, therefore prayed that:- (a) A writ/ direction/ order in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or as deemed fit be issued to the respondents to extend the service tenure of the petitioner with all consequential benefits. (b) The respondents also be directed to absorb the petitioner and the respondents be directed to permit the petitioner to continue the petitioner to work upto the age of 62 years and the services of the petitioner be extended. (c) This petition be allowed with costs. (d) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit be also granted. " 2] Admittedly, the petitioner has not filed any representation before the respondents, before filing this petition.
3] In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with all the relevant documents before the respondent No. 2/competent authority within a period of two weeks from today, which shall be decided by the respondent No. 2/competent authority in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months. 4] It is made clear that this Court has not reflected upon the merits of the case. 5] With the aforesaid, present petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Bahar Signature Not Verified Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 02-02-2024 17:44:29
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.