Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Sri Srinibash Saha v. The State of Tripura and Others

Court: High Court of Tripura

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-04-16. Sri Srinibash Saha v. The State of Tripura and Others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_ WP(C) No. 625 of 2025 Sri Srinibash Saha, S/o. Lt. Kshir Mohan Saha, Proprietor - New Shiva Enterprise, Having its office at Lenin Sarani, Akhaura Rpad (Jakson Gate) Agartala, P. O Agartala, P. S- West Agartala, District West Tripura, 799001. ………Petitioner(s) -V E R S U S- 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary, Urban Development Deptt. Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, P. O. and P. S NCC, Agartala, District West Tripura. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Agartala Municipal Corporation, P. S. West Agartala, District West Tripura, 799001. 3. The Executive Engineer, Elect. Division, Agartala Municipal Corporation, Bipani Bitan, 2nd Floor, P. S- West Agartala, District West Tripura, 799002. 4. The Assistant Engineer (Elect), Agartala Municipal Corporation, Agartala, 799001. 5. Shri Rajesh Dey, S/o. Shri Narayan Chandra Dey, Resident of Ranjit Nagar, PO Ramnagar, PS West Agartala, District West Tripura, Pin- 799002. 6.

Curiosity Construction Pvt. Ltd, (Electrical Contractor), 37 Central Road, Room No. 4, Kaman Chowmuhani, Agartala, P. O Agartala, 799001, West Tripura, Director, Shri Mrinmoy Das. ……. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapas Kumar Deb, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapash Datta Majumder, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Saugat Datta, Advocate, Mr. Arijit Bhowmik, Advocate, Ms. Shipthang Rani Kaipeng, Advocate. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT =O=R=D=E=R= 16/04/2026 Counsel for the respondent No. 5 states on instruction that the contract awarded has already been executed. In view of that, the counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permitted to do so. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BISWAJIT PALIT, J) (M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ) Manti D’Barma

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.