PRITI PATEL v. COLLECTOR, SUNDARGARH
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-23. PRITI PATEL v. COLLECTOR, SUNDARGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 20344 of 2019 Priti Patel .. …... Petitioner (s) Mr. Prasanta Kumar Nanda, Adv. -Versus- Collector, Sundargarh & Ors. ……. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Bibekananda Nayak, AGA CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 23. 12. 2025 Order No. 10. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to whya writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s) shall not be issued to restrain the Opp. Parties to stop in making the structure for manufacture of products situated over the petitioner’s property situated in khata no. 12, plot no.
43 of mouza- Podhabahal under Sundargarh Tahasil of Sundargarh without following due process of law and further be pleased to restrain the Tahasildar, Sundargarh/Opp. Party No. 3 to demolish the structure over the property where the petitioner is in peaceful possession and on perusal of causes shown if any or in any insufficient causes shown make the said rule absolute may pass such other order/orders as deemed just and proper. ” Signature Not Verified 4. Regard being had to the facts and submission and without going Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 23-Dec-2025 20:02:54 into the merit of the case, since no notice for demolition of the Brick kiln has yet been issued to the present Petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Writ Petition. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court as and when tangible cause of action survives. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ( Dr.
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 23-Dec-2025 20:02:54
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.