SMT.MUNIYAMMA v. SRI.MUNITHIMMAIAH
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: D K SINGH,TARA VITASTA GANJU
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-12. SMT.MUNIYAMMA v. SRI.MUNITHIMMAIAH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 622 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 622 OF 2014 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE. MANTAGAIAH D/O LATE. MUNITHIMMA @ MUNITHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S 1a. SRI. RACHAIAH S/O LATE MANTAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 1b. SMT. SAKAMMA W/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 1c. SMT. SHILAVATHI D/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS - 2 - RFA No. 622 of 2014 1d. KUMARI. ROOPA D/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 1e. KUMARI. DEEPA D/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 1f. KUMARI. RAMYA D/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 1g. SMT. RAJAMMA W/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 1h. SRI. SIDDARAJU S/O LATE MUNIPOOJIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 1i. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O SRI. NARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 1j. SRI.
THIMMARAYAPPA W/O LATE MANTAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 1k. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O SRI. NARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS - 3 - RFA No. 622 of 2014 1l. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRI. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT AGRA DHAKALE, BYRASANDRA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 062. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE)(ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. MUNITHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SRI. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 3 ARE SONS OF LATE. BETTA AND ALL ARE R/AT: BYRASANDRA VILLAGE, AGRA PANCHAYATHI KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 062. - 4 - RFA No. 622 of 2014 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M S NAGARAJA FOR C/R1-3, ADVOCATE)(ABSENT) THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC. 96 R/W U/O 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22. 2. 2014 PASSED IN O. S.
477/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE AND ETC. , THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 5 - RFA No. 622 of 2014 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. We have taken up this appeal in the revised call. None has appeared for the appellants. The order sheet is replete with adjournments. 2. The appeal is of the year 2014. It appears that the appellants have lost interest to prosecute the appeal and therefore, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Digitally signed by DINESH KUMAR SINGH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA (D K SINGH) JUDGE Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE UN List No. : 1 Sl No. : 14
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.