PARAMJEET SINGH v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-02. PARAMJEET SINGH v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE nd ON THE 2 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 20177 of 2018 BETWEEN:- PARAMJEET SINGH S/O LATE SHRI DEVENDRA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL GANGA COLONY B. G. ROAD (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI NIRMAL SHARMA - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR FARMER WELFARE AND AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR FARMER WELFARE AND AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT GUAN (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. COLLECTOR THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....
RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VISHAL TRIPATHI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- "It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and respondents be directed to grant the compassionate appointment on the vacant post of Assistant Grade-III under the respondent No. 3 or in any office. Any other relief in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted. " Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in respect of the petitioner's grievance, he has also preferred representations/letters but the same have not been decided till date by the respondents. A limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner that if the respondent No. 4 is directed to decide his pending representations/letters dated 20. 05. 2007, 16. 06. 2007, 18. 02.
2008 (Annexure P/10) in accordance with law in a time bound manner, his grievance would be redressed. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/State submits that if such directions are issued, he has no objection. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 4 to decide the pending representations/letters of the petitioner (Annexure P/10) by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. E-copy/certified copy as per rules.
(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE Ashish* Digitally signed by ASHISH CHAURASIA ASHISHDN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYAPRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGHCOURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR,2. 5. 4. 20=bf81a9adb1da24e4bc7b51951 54c3d4de08c6bb9303e52e2e7e728d9b CHAUR ac85bd3, postalCode=474001,st=Madhya Pradesh, serialNumber=A926F3CBF979ECA6A4C477577EEDBA3AB4F94593A930B98DA E1B0AD16F90B5FD, cn=ASHISH ASIA CHAURASIADate: 2024. 01. 03 17:26:28 -08'00'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.