Pan Shops Owners Association of India v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-23. Pan Shops Owners Association of India v. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
t 3300 I STATE OF TELANGANA HIGH COURT FOR THE. ' ATHYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TWENW THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER MONDAY ,THE rWb TUOUSNND AND TWENW FOUR RESENT BHEEMAPAKA SRI JUSTICE NAGESH THE HONOURABLE oF 2013 WRIT PETITION NO: 4337 Between: by its (F"p 1562 ot 2007) Rep' Pan Shops Owners Association of lndia, IF ased 73 years nao-slblat6 R' Venkataiah' oresident sri. nangar;iSt;tiIJt 76' Hanuman ;io"'pi'riiE s;ii;' iroo-p^ 8-1 -'l fHffifi#' ddni"A ^Bazaar' 5o00o01 kotni Roao, Hvderabad -iJiti", d"'i. istr""t, ... ,ET'TIONER AND De-partment of . 1. the secretary of the The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Secreta n x Avder abad-22. Med i ca I H ea tth a nd W r ia'r""'C,i"! -rni"e ni -e*"rnr"ht -of Andhra Pradesh, " 2. The commissioner';i'i"";J's;i;tv,- Hvderabad-29 lnspector and Designated Offrcer' ffice of the District 3. The District, Food -' Food lnsoector, HYderabad-29 Govemment of Andhra potice General of Police, 4. The cnut a'HiiJcio", Pradesh, Hyderabad-04 ...
RES'ONDENTS in the lndia praying of the Constitution of that Petition under Article 226 may be therewith' the Hlgh Court in the affidavit filed circumstances stated pleasedtoissueaWrit,orderorDirectionmoreparticularlyoneinnatureofwrit to 4 not to restrain Petitioner from the Respondents 1 of Mandamus directing i'e or pure tobacco products or storing of chewing tobacco ' selling, distributing the G'O'Ms'6 as the same are not covered by Zarda, Khaini, Sada Zarda etc ' no right take any to declare that the respondent have to dated 9. 1-2013 and products 5y virtue of or tobacco steps or action(s) against chewing tobacco G. O. Ms. 6 dated 09-01-2013 1. A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP . NO: 5404 oF 2013) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents not to seize/confisciate the chewing tobacco or pure tobacco products which mentioned as item No.
6 in the schedure of the crp Act i'e , Zarda, Khaini' sada Zarda etc. , as the same are not covered by the G. o. Ms. 6 dated 9-1-2013 and FSS Act and Reguration 2011, pending disposar of the writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. A JAYAWANTRAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1. to3: Gp FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER BHEEMAPAI(A NAGESH WSTICE HON'BLE SRI of20tg. ' ol{ No. 4337 WRIT ORDER: in the action of authorities The petitioner challenges that products' It is his case him from selling tobacco restraining Sada' Zarda etc'' Zarda' KtLaJLni' products, namely' the tobacco and dated O9'O1'2O13 covered by G'O'Ms'No'6' are not is illegal and of the authorities the interference therefore, arbitrary. It was last on 13'02'2O13' petition was admitted 2.
The writ petitioner in 2Ct24 arrd the We are now ' listed on l2'O4'2O13' for over a getting the matter Iisted steps for taken aly has not decade. under the caption was listed ot 16 12 '2024 3. This matter on no representation cases'' there was "Specially Identifred to adjourned was therefore' The matter behalf of tJle petitioner' 23. r2. 2024. no there is is called' matter when the 4. Today that ttre [t appears petitioner' on behalf of the representation petition' in pursuing this writ is not interested petitioner for non-prosecution' is dismissed the Writ Petition Therefore, No costs. stand any' shall pending if applications, Miscellaneous closed. Ln . L. LAKS SD, T ASSISTA ICER COPY" N OFF ,TTRUE SE H:j:::;x:1'n"' 1$;*fi"$$iffi1. -j'-F'#f$JH! ff BM/BsKqp- HIGH COURT DATED:2311212024 :'. _- '. -\. , E. S '(,i. -. \ ( i:- ORDER lr ,-i t li.. 1il i. \i'7; WP. No. 4337 ot 2013 \r. ' ll \. - DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS tu :{il2{ . {. *c+L{-5
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.