PARVEEN THAKUR v. HRTC AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-29. PARVEEN THAKUR v. HRTC AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6208 of 2020 a/w connected matters Date of decision : 29. 12. 2020 1. CWP No. 6208/2020 Parveen Thakur … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 2. CWP No. 6209/2020 Mansa Ram … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 3. CWP No. 6210/2020 Abhishek Kumar … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 4. CWP No. 6211/2020 Uday Kumar Mahant … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 5. CWP No. 6212/2020 Ghanshyam …2… … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 6. CWP No. 6213/2020 Suneel Kumar … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 7. CWP No. 6220/2020 Hans Ran … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents 8. CWP No.
6292/2020 Raj Kumar … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mehar Chand and Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocates for the respective petitioner(s). For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate for the respondents in all the petitions, except CWP No. 6292 of 2020. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …3… Mr. Shyam Singh, Advocate, for the respondents in CWP No. 6292 of 2020. PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice (oral) Learned counsel for both the parties, submit that the cases of the petitioner(s) are squarely covered by the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal Nos. 1557- 1564 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.
16158-16165/2016), titled Himachal Road Transport Corporation versus Lekh Ram and others (Annexure P-4) and pray that the instant writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment. 2. In view of the above submissions, we deem it proper to dispose of the present writ petitions with a direction to the petitioner(s) to make a detailed representation(s) before the respondent-competent authority, highlighting the aforesaid judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court, within a period of one week from today. On making such representation(s) by the petitioner(s), the respondent-competent authority is directed to consider the same in light of the aforesaid judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court and take a conscious decision in the matter within three months thereafter. …4… Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice (Anoop Chitkara), Judge December 29, 2020 (KS)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.