R. RAM PRASAD v. THE STATE OF TS
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-29. R. RAM PRASAD v. THE STATE OF TS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR 2018 CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 2694 0F Between: S/o, Nagabushanam R/o' Narsapuram,m, ' 1 Ravulaoalli Ram Prasad' District dr. -r,]guO"m [,4andal . Bhadaradn Kothagudem R/o Narsapuram m' 2. Ravulapalli Ravi Kumar, S/o Nagabushanam' ' District ijr. i. iliroem Mandal. , Bhadaradri Kothagudem tr'4andal Bhadradri Kothagudem 3. lrl. Ramu, S/o. Ratnam, R/o Atapaka Atapaka ' ' District "'PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDNo'2'a AND High Court at Hyderabad rep' by its Public Prosecutor' The State of Telangana, ... RESPONDENT stated circumstances that in the of Cr'P C Petition under Section 482 ryu. y,inS mav be pleased p"tition'rtl" niqn court of G'";;;;-"ib;minat No' 2515 of in the Memorandum in crl'M P oiJ"" at'. 1,+'l,'i"zoli ,n tonnJ"t-io-n"*[n to call for records Magistrate of I Class at o'i t'e Honor" 187120L ilIi"'ii; 't'o"iat 20'1 s in C.
C. No. quash the same Ahadracnalam and t. A. NO: 1 OF 2018 stated that in the circumstances of Cr'P C qra'yi'1S-be Petition under Section 482 ioh Court may Pleased n e r/Acc Jf the io u sed J, ;; i n t n e H,lI. a g1;';xx. ";$"":,}"". i Petlt io 1 i i : : l ll tg procee". ";:*"i. ;iu": Honble Judicral to stay ail further the file of the 187/2011 on criminal No 02 to 04 in connecttor sal of the above pendins dispo bnalracnatam ' i Ctutt at il"ro;. l,;l""ot petition. on for hearins This Petition coming 'T: 1,""t';::,i::Y:il3fil"ffiil o n b e h a r ;:;;''" * :T;"'il ";^XU:::U:i#:,ffi1:? "''"' *: lllXl No 1' of the Respondent " ORDER the following: The Court made THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Criminal Petition No. 2694 of 2018 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr. P C' seeking to quash the order dated 14. 11. 2017 passed in Crl'M. P. No. 2515 of 2017 in CC No.
187 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam, wherein the petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos. 2 to 4. ,infructuous Today, the matter is listed under the caption matters' and when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, based on the e-courts case status report, would submit that after full_fledged trial, the case was disposed of by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam, through judgment dated, 24. O2. 2020 wherein the matter has resulted in conviction of the accused and as such, the present quash petition filed does not need any further consideration by this court, as the petitioners/A. 2 to A. 4 are entitled to avail remedy of appeal against the said conviction. Having regard to the submissions made as above, no further orders need be passed in the present criminal petition. Accordingly, the criminal petition IS closed. However, the petitioners/A. 2 to A.
4 are at liberty to file a petition seeking to reopen the matter, in the event the said CC has not been disposed ol by the trial Court as noted above. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. Sd/. I. NAGA LAKS MI I ASSISTANT REGI ,TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To, The Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Bhadrachalam. 2 The Station House Officer, Bhadrachalam Town Police Station, Bhadrachalam 3 Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 One CC to SRl. MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:291'1212020 tl E S i4 ( /\ o (-) 11 JAI 2021 7: O >. --t ORDER CRLP. No. 2694 of 2018 CI-OSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION .! N copraf I t \--o*t il\-o-1 \o\ . / \\
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.