MD. ABDUR RAHMAN v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-10-08. MD. ABDUR RAHMAN v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 33-63 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C) No. 590 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 223 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 231 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 69 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 10 of 2023 with WP(C) No. 109 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 114 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 125 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 177 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 187 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 205 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 269 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 270 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 329 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 359 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 365 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 366 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 386 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 401 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 406 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 602 of 2020 with WP(C) No. 605 of 2020 with WP(C) No. 619 of 2020 with WP(C) No. 660 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 662 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 71 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 746 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 77 of 2021 with WP(C) No. 78 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 811 of 2022 with WP(C) No. 93 of 2022 Md. Abdur Rahman ….. Applicant/s - Versus – State of Manipur & 3 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 08. 10. 2024 [1] Heard Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Bipin, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G. A. for the State respondent. [2] The applicant is petitioner in WP(C) No. 109 of 2021 challenging the initiation of D. E. afresh after enquiry report was submitted. [3] It is submitted that enquiry report dated 18. 11. 2020 has already been submitted by the enquiry officer to the department, however, the same is not acted upon on the pleading that writ petition is pending. [4] Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that the application may be disposed of by making an innocuous observation and the disciplinary authority may act upon the enquiry report notwithstanding the pendency of the writ petition. [5] Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G. A. for the State respondent, has also agreeable to the proposition submitted by the learned senior counsel for the applicant.
[6] Misc. application being MC(WP(C) No. 590 of 2024 is disposed of with the observation that the disciplinary authority is at liberty to act upon the enquiry report dated 18. 11. 2020. [7] List the remaining cases on 18. 11. 2024. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring Digitally signed by KH. KH. JOSHUA JOSHUA MARING Date: 2024. 10. 08 MARING 15:47:33 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.