HARDIKKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR v. DIKSHA D/O RAMANBHAI PARMAR
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2026-06-15. HARDIKKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR v. DIKSHA D/O RAMANBHAI PARMAR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1422 of 2024 ========================================================== HARDIKKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR Versus DIKSHA D/O RAMANBHAI PARMAR ========================================================== Appearance: MR AV NAIR(5602) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR SAMIR B GOGDA(11306) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI Date : 15/06/2026 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI) Judgement and order dated 17/10/2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nadiad dismissing the suit preferred by the appellant – husband seeking dissolution of the marriage solemnized with the respondent – wife is sought to be assailed in this First Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. 2.
Though served, none remained present for the respondent – wife. 3. Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant. Learned Advocate for the appellant, after arguing the matter to some extent and upon instructions received from the appellant has submitted that the matter may be remanded to the learned Family Court concerned to explore the possibility of amicable settlement which can only to be undertaken before the learned Family Court as the suit preferred by the appellant – husband seeking dissolution of marriage was dismissed wherein the respondent – wife has chosen not to remain present though served with the process of notice. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned Advocate for the appellant to explore the possibility of amicable settlement before the learned Family Court concerned, the impugned order is hereby quashed and set aside to the extent of relegating the appellant to approach the learned Family Court concerned so as to seek appropriate relief. 5.
Needless to say that this Court has not gone into the merits of matter and the learned Court concerned shall decide the matter in accordance with the law. 6. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of. (ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) sompura
Source: High Court of Gujarat. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.