Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Sri Himangshu Sekhar Chanda v. Sri Apurba Roy and Ors

Court: High Court of Tripura

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-02-23. Sri Himangshu Sekhar Chanda v. Sri Apurba Roy and Ors. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA CONT. CAS(C) NO. 1 OF 2026 Sri Himangshu Sekhar Chanda (61 Years) S/o- Late Harendra Bijoy Chanda, Resident of Village- Post Office Road (Near B. B. I. staff quarter), P. O. - Dharmanagar, P. S- Dharmanager, Dist. - North Tripura, Pin- 799250. ....... Petitioner(s) VERSUS 1. Sri Apurba Roy, The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799006. 2. Sri Gitte Kirankumar Dinkarrao, The Secretary, PWD, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799006. 3. Er. Sudhan Debbarma, The Chief Engineer Water Resource Division, Govt. of Tripura P. N. Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799006 4. Sri Partha Sarathi Paul, The Executive Engineer, Resource Division, Govt. of Tripura, Panchamukh, Agartala, West Tripura. 5. Sri Ranendu Sarkar The Accountant General (A&E), Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799006. .........

Respondent(s) Present:- For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. S. Deb(Gupta), Advocate. Mr. B. Paul, Advocate. Ms. S. Rani Paul, Advocate. Mr. Ram Prasad Gope, Advocate. Ms. A. Saha, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, Sr. Advocate. Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. G. A. Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharjee, G. A. Mr. D. Sharma, Addl. G. A. Ms. A. Chakraborty, Advocate. HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD FINAL ORDER 23. 02. 2026 1. Heard Mrs. S. Deb (Gupta), learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya, learned G. A. appearing for respondent No. 1; Mr. D. Sharma, learned Addl. G. A. appearing for respondents No. 2, 3 and 4; and Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No. 5. In terms of the order of this Court, the respondents appeared in person before this Court. 2.

The present contempt case has been filed seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for alleged deliberate violation and willful disobedience of the Judgment and Order dated 13. 12. 2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 771 of 2024. 3. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that the order has already been passed and the same has been duly communicated. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed and the personal appearance of the respondents are dispensed with. DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD, J Suhanjit RAJKUMAR Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA SUHANJIT Date: 2026. 02. 24 14:44:49 +05'30' SINGHA

Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.