SARLA SUTHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. SARLA SUTHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38225] (1 of 2) [CW-18349/2026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18349/2026 CNR: RJHC010784002026 | URN: CW / 31705U / 2026 Sarla Suthar D/o Megharam Suthar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jamsar Tehsil Lunkaransar Dist. Bikaner Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary School Education Dept. Govt. Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education Raj. Bikaner 3. The Principal, Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School Lunkaransar Bikaner 4. Vijay Lakshmi, Lecturer Gr. 1 History Govt. Sr. Secondary School Kuchor Aathuni Bikaner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. NK Mehta, Dy. G. C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, makes a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in an expeditious manner. 2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that vide office order dated 17. 07. 2026, a Grievance Redressal Committee has been constituted in respect to transfer of single women/widow/divorcee/employees suffering from terminal illness and various other issues. He submits that the petitioner can file her representation before the Grievance Committee, which will [2026:RJ-JP:38225] (2 of 2) [CW-18349/2026] consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner in an expeditious manner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the grievance raised herein and also the fact that a Grievance Committee has been constituted vide office order dated 17. 07.
2026, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file her representation before the Grievance Committee within a period of ‘7 days’ from today and the Committee shall decide the representation within a period of ‘15 days’ thereafter, strictly in accordance with law by way of passing a speaking order. 5. Till the decision of the representation, the impugned order dated 10. 07. 2026 (Annex. 1) shall remain stayed qua the petitioner, in case, she has not joined at the new place of posting. 6. It is made clear that in case, the petitioner fails to file a representation within a period of one week from today, the interim order granted by this Court shall stand vacated automatically. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 75/Sombeer Singh
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.