MRS. KHRIELIEVIU v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-11-05. MRS. KHRIELIEVIU v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/4 GAHC020002002021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/80/2021 MRS. KHRIELIEVIU W/O LATE SHULE @ SHULI LOWER PWD COLONY, KOHIMA, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA Page No. # 2/4 6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WORKS AND HOUSING NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (HOUSING) DIVISION NO.
1 KOHIMA NAGALAND 8:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (H) WOKHA NAGALAND 9:THE TREASURY OFFICER WOKHA NAGALAND 10:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : I. IMTI LONGCHAR, SUPONGWATI WALLING,KIROBA,R ATSULA KIPS,KEKHRIESENUO,H ZELIANG Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No. # 3/4 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 05. 11. 2024 Heard Ms. Obangmenla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Junior Government Advocate for the State respondent. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking direction to regularize a service of her husband Late. Shule @ Shuli in the post of w/c P/Helper posted under Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) Housing (H), Wokha, Nagaland, with effect from 27. 03. 2023 to 09. 04. 2019 and consequential release of family pension and other benefits. Ms.
Obangmenla, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to the death of the petitioner’s husband on 09. 04. 2019, the petitioner filed a representation on 04. 09. 2019 before the Engineer-in-Chief, Nagaland, Kohima, seeking regularization of the service of her husband in the post to which he was appointed as w/c P/Helper under Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) Housing (H), Wokha, on temporary basis in the scale pay of Rs. 800-18- 890-20-1050-25-1475 per month plus all other allowances. She further submits that the aforesaid representation having been not acted upon, the present writ petition had to be filed. Page No. # 4/4 Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Junior Government Advocate for the State respondent fairly submits that he has no objection in the event, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the State respondent to consider the said representation in accordance with law.
In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for both the parties, this court is of the considered opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of, in the interest of justice, by directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04. 09. 2019 in accordance with law within a period of 2 (two) months from the receipt of the certified copy of the order. Ordered accordingly. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.