AJIT KUMAR And ANR. v. UNION BANK OF INDIA And ORS.
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-27. AJIT KUMAR And ANR. v. UNION BANK OF INDIA And ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:12220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 6422 of 2010 ------ 1. Ajit Kumar, son of Late Arjun Kumar, residing at Dimna Basti, Upper Tala, P. O. MGM Medical College, Jamshedpur, P. S. Ulidih (Mango), Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East 2. Ganesh Shaw, son of Late Hari Shaw, residing at Dahighuttu, Mango, P. O. and P. S. Mango, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. Union Bank of India, Jamshedpur, Main Branch, Jamshedpur, represented by its Chief Manager 2. M/s Laxmi Ore Minerals Pvt. Ltd. represented by Director, Ramesh Kumar Singh, Ashiana Trade Centre, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum (East) 3. Smt. Laxmi Singh, wife of Ramesh Kumar Singh, residing at F 4/3, Nishant Vihar, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum (East) 4. Rohit Kumar Singh, son of Ramesh Kumar Singh, residing at F 4/3, Nishant Vihar, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum (East) 5.
Ramesh Kumar Singh, son of not known as not mentioned by the plaintiff, residing at F 4/3, Nishant Vihar, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum (East) .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : None For the Respondent-Bank : Mr. P. A. S. Pati, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate ------ 07/27. 04. 2026 This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arising out of the proceeding in O. A. Case No. 111 of 2008 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi. On repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for the Union Bank of India is present. The matter is of the year 2010. On 06. 03. 2020, 05. 04. 2021, 19. 04. 2021 and 12. 01. 2026, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners which clearly suggests that the petitioners have lost interest in this case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Anit Uploaded 28. 04. 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.