PRADEEP R. DESHMUKH v. UNION OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GOUTAM BHADURI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-11-25. PRADEEP R. DESHMUKH v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2769 of 2020 1. Pradeep R. Deshmukh S/o Raghunath Rao Deshmukh, Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Nikhil Deshmukh, S/o Shri Pradeep R. Deshmukh, Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. Arpita Deshmukh, W/o Shri Naveen Deshmukh, Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. Naveen Deshmukh, S/o Shri Nishikant Deshmukh, Aged About 41 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5. Pratik Deshmukh, S/o Shri Nishikant Deshmukh, Aged About 45 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6. Nishikan R. Deshmukh, S/o Shri Raghunath Rao Deshmukh, Aged About 73 Years R/o House No.
148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7. Smt. Reena Deshmukh, W/o Shri Pratik Deshmukh, Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 148, Nagar Nigam Colony, Behind Hotel Mangalam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8. Deepak Deshpande, S/o Shri Bhalchandra Deshpande Aged About 62 Years R/o S. No. 47, Flat No. 103, Building C, M S R Olive Jambhulwadi Road, Dutta Nagar, Ambedgaon B K, Pune (Maharashtra) 9. Smt. Sadhana Deshpande, W/o Shri Deepak Deshpande, Aged About 58 Years R/o S. No. 47, Flat No. 103, Building C, M S R Olive Jambhulwadi Road, Dutta Nagar, Ambedgaon B K, Pune (Maharashtra) 10. Smt. Anagha Mulkar, W/o Late Shri Ashok Mulkar Aged About 65 Years R/o B-114, E D, Janki Nagar, Chuna Bhatti, Kolar Road, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) ---- Petitioners Versus 1.
Union Of India Through Central Registrar, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare Department Of Agriculture Co-Operation And Farmers Welfare Office Of The Central Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi 2. Commissioner, Office Of The Central Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare Department Agriculture, Cooperation And Farmers Welfare Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Registrar, Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. Registration No. MSCS/CR/269/2008 Central Office Udaipur (Rajasthan). 4. H. S. Patel, Liquidator, Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. 14, Vidya Vihar Colony, Usmanpura, Ahmedabad 380013, Gujrat. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sunil Verma, Advocate For Respondents/ UOI : Shri Amit Banerjee, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 25. 11. 2020 Heard 1.
The limited grievance that the petitioner has raised in this case is that the petitioners had made certain deposits in the respondent No. 3 Adarsh Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. under various schemes and heads, however, subsequently the respondent No. 3 establishment has been closed and at the instance of respondent No. 1 a Liquidator was also appointed i. e. respondent No. 4. 2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that meanwhile the deposits of other creditors were released, however, the deposits made by the petitioners were not released. The petitioners make a limited prayer that let the respondents No. 1&4 take a decision on the claim application of the petitioners seeking for release of the amount lying deposited with the respondent No. 3. 3. The limited request made by the petitioners is not opposed by the learned Assistant Solicitor General. 4. Accordingly, the respondents No.
1&4 are directed to take a decision on the application which the petitioners have filed seeking for release of the amount which is lying with the respondent No. 3 which was deposited by the petitioners under different schemes and heads. It is expected that the authorities would take a decision at the earliest preferably within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order purely in accordance with rules and guidelines governing the field. 5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Jyoti
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.