Pedda Panga Pranay v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-16. Pedda Panga Pranay v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22680 OF 2020 Between: Pedda Panga Pranay, S/o Karunanidhi, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Agriculture Extension Officer, R/o Suryapet Town, Suryapet District ... pETtTtoNER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Registrar, Professor Jayashankar Agriculture University, Administrative Office, Rajend ranagar, Hyd era bad-500030 3. The Commissioner and Agriculture Director, Agriculture Department, Telangana State, Oio Basheerbagh, Ground Floor, D-Block Fathe lr/idan, Near Nizam College, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad-01 4 The Joint Director-cum-District Agriculture Officer, Agriculture Department, Suryapeta, Suryapeta District, (Erstwhile Naigonda District). ...
RESpoNDENrS Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\,4andamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.
3 in non-considering the application of the petitioner, and non-initiating to select the petitioner to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) and non-following the role of reservation in selecting the candidates to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) Course is highly illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner and to select the petitioner to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) and to follow the role of reservation in selecting the candidates to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) Course lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner and to select the petitioner to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) and to follow the role of reservation in selecting the candidates to the BSC Agriculture Under Graduate Course (UGC) Course pending disposal of the writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to stay of all selections up to finalization of role of reservations in the selections candidates of BSC Agriculture Course pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.
1, 3 & 4: GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SMT. G. NEERAJA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 22680 of 2020 ORDER: The petitioner's grievance is that though he filed application dated 06. 07. 2020 to respondent No. 4 for his admission into B. Sc. , (Hons) under 'ln-Service Quota' for the academic year 2020-21 reserved for Agricultural Extension Officers in terms of G. O. tt/s. No. 328. dated 14. 06. 2017, the same is not being disposed of till date. Having regard to the nature of relief sought in the writ petition, respondent No. 3-Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, State of Telangana, is directed to take decision as to whether the petitioner is eligible to be considered in terms of the Service Regulations and in terms of the priority, which is accorded to other aspirants as well, and communicate the same to the petitioner.
This exercise shall be completed within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Itrliscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-CH,VENKATESW ULU ASSISTANT RE STRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1 The Commissioner and Agriculture Director, Agriculture Department, Telangana State, O/o Basheerbagh, Ground Floor, D-Block Fathe Midan, Near Nizam College, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad-01 2. One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar Advocate [OPUC] J. Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT) 4. One CC to Smt. G. Neeraja Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies MBC \.!. -. - HIGH COURT DATED: 1611212020 e STA 'r4: I H ( 4 o o 24 DEC2U0 * fi r, ORDER WP. No. 22680 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1r:J ,>\ \>
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.