Ram Khelawan Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-24. Ram Khelawan Yadav v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16648 of 2022 ====================================================== 1. Ram Khelawan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal and P. S. - Bithan, District - Samastipur. 2. Chet Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal and P. S. - Bithan, District - Samastipur. 3. Prabhu Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal and P. S. - Bithan, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, Samastipur. 3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur. 4. The Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna through its Chairman. 5. The Chairman, the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna. 6.
The Secretary, the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna. 7. The Senior Project Engineer, the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, Work Division, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GA-13 For the Respondent No. 4 to 7: Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarsi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 7 24-04-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 to 7, Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited as well as learned AC to GA-13 for the State are present. 3. Earlier, also, none had appeared on behalf of the Patna High Court CWJC No. 16648 of 2022(7) dt. 24-04-2026 2/2 petitioners.
It seems that the petitioners had lost interest in the present writ application. 4. The application stands dismissed for want of non-prosecution. (Sourendra Pandey, J) manoj/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.