MR SREEKANTH R v. NAVI FINSERV LIMITED
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. MR SREEKANTH R v. NAVI FINSERV LIMITED. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 25831 of 2025 C/W WP No. 5235 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 25831 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 5235 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) IN WP No. 25831/2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR. SREEKANTH R. , S/O MR. HONNEGOWDA RAMESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 2. MRS. ARPANA W/O MR. SREEKANTH R AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 143/1, TH TH Digitally signed 4 MAIN ROAD, 8 CROSS, by SUVARNA T NEAR SHANTHI UPAHARA HOTEL Location: HIGH COURT OF CHAMARAJPET KARNATAKA BENGALURU 3 560 018 &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA H. J. , ADVOCATE) AND: NAVI FINSERV LIMITED REGISTERED UNDER BANKING ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, ND REGISTERED OFFICE, 2 FLOOR, VAISHNAVI TECH SQUARE, IBALLUR VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI - 2 - WP No. 25831 of 2025 C/W WP No. 5235 of 2024 BENGALURU 3 560 102 &RESPONDENT (BY SRI.
ADIT NILESH SHAH, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 01. 08. 2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE AT ANNEXURE- A. IN WP NO. 5235/2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. SREEKANTH R. , S/O MR. HONNEGOWDA RAMESH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 2. MRS. ARPANA W/O MR. SREEKANTH R. , AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 143/1 TH TH 4 MAIN ROAD, 8 C ROSS NEAR SHANTHI UPAHARA HOTEL CHAMARAJAPET BENGALURU -560 018 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H. J. ANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S NAVI FINSERV LIMITED REPRSENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER REGISTERED OFFICE ND 2 FLOOR, AMR TECH PARK HONGASANDRA VILLAGE HOSUR ROAD BENGALURU -560 068 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ADIT NILESH SHAH, ADVOCATE) - 3 - WP No. 25831 of 2025 C/W WP No. 5235 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 13. 2. 24 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER WP. No. 25831/2025 is filed seeking the following prayer: "Wherefore, the petitioners most respectfully pray that, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to: (i) Issue a writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned possession notice dated 01/08/2025 issued by the respondent vide at ANNEXURE-A in the interest of justice and equity (ii) To pass any appropriate orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of this writ petition in the interest of justice and equity. " 2. WP. No.
5235/2024 is filed seeking the following prayer: "Wherefore, the petitioners most respectfully pray that, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to: (i) Issue a writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned notice dated 13/02/2024 issued by the respondent vide at ANNEXURE-A in the interest of justice and equity (ii) To pass any appropriate orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of this writ petition in the interest of justice and equity. " 3. The writ petitions are filed against Navi Finserv Limited which is a private finance company. In the light of the law laid - 4 - WP No. 25831 of 2025 C/W WP No. 5235 of 2024 down by the Apex Court in case of Phoenix Arc Private 1 Limited Vs. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others , the writ petition against private finance company is not maintainable. Hence, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i.
Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. ii. The petitioners shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had granted interim order, it shall be in force for a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. iv. All I. As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No. : 1 Sl No. : 30 1 (2022) 5 SCC 345
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.