SMT RENUKA ALIYAS SHARAVARI W/O SHASHIKANT DESHPANDE v. SRI RAMESH S/O SADASHIV KULKARNI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT VIJAYALAXMI W/O RAMESH KULKARNI
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-08-21. SMT RENUKA ALIYAS SHARAVARI W/O SHASHIKANT DESHPANDE v. SRI RAMESH S/O SADASHIV KULKARNI SINCE DEAD BY...
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 100459 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100459 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. RENUKA @ SHARAVARI W/O SHASHIKANT DESHPANDE, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: SHINDIKURBET VILLAGE, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY MISS. RUKMINI PATIL. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS. B. NAIK. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAMESH S/O SHADASHIV KULKARNI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. , 1(A). SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O RAMESH KULKARNI, AGE: 63 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R 1(B). SMT. SUBHADA W/O RAMESH KULKARNI, Location: HIGH AGE: 50 YEARS, COURT OF KARNATAKA 1(C). SMT. USHA W/O SANTOSH DESHPANDE, AGE: 28 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 1(A) TO 1(C) ARE R/O: MAHANTESH NAGAR, NEAR DR. NAIKWADI HOSPITAL, GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK. 2. SHRI. SURESH S/O SADASHIV KULKARNI, AGE: 54 YEARS, R/O: GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK. - 2 - RFA No. 100459 of 2023 3. SMT.
ANASUYA @ REKHA W/O KALYAN BELAVADIKAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, R/O: NEAR NUTAN BANK, ICHALKARANJI, DIST: KOLHAPUR, STATE: MAHARASTRA. 4. SRI. HARISH S/O RAMESH KULKARNI, AGE: 35 YEARS, R/O: GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK. 5. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA S/O RAMESH KULKARNI, AGE: 34 YEARS, R/O: GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK. 6. SRI. VINAYAK S/O SURESH KULKARNI, AGE: 19 YEARS, R/O: GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK. 7. SRI. PUNDALIK S/O BHIMASEN RAIBAGE, AGE: 52 YEARS, R/O: H. NO. 559, SARAFI GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI. 8. SRI. VITHAL S/O BHIMASEN RAIBAGE, AGE: 54 YEARS, R/O: H. NO. 1182, SARAFI GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI. 9. SMT. SUJATA W/O BHIMARAO, AGE: 45 YEARS, R/O: SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Ms. Rukmini Patil. , learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Srinivas B. Naik. , for the appellant has appeared in person. - 3 - RFA No.
100459 of 2023 Counsel for the appellant seeks time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 01. 08. 2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. However, in the interest of justice and as a last chance, finally two weeks time was granted to comply office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non compliance of office objections’ on 21. 08. 2024. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The appellant has not respected the Court order. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP LIST NO. : 1 SL NO. : 21
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.