SYEDA MISHALI NAZA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-09. SYEDA MISHALI NAZA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010157792020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3228/2019 SYEDA MISHALI NAZA D/O SYED ATIKUR RAHMAN R/O AHMED APARTMENT MILAN NAGAR-II NEAR E. COM TOWER VIP P. O. GUWAHATI AIRPORT DIST. -KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN-781015 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN JAWAHAR NAGAR GUWAHATI-781022 3:THE SECRETARY ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPAR-781022 4:THE PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA-781022 5:The Registrar Page No.
# 2/3 Assam Agriculture University Barbheta Jorhat Assam 785013 6:The Registrar Assam Science and Technology University Tetelia Road near Assam Engineering College Jalukbari Guwahati Assam 781013 7:The Registrar Srimanta Sankaradeva University of Health Sciences 2nd Floor Gauhati Medical College Building Gauhati Medical College Hill-Top Road Narkashur Hilltop Bhangagarh Guwahati Assam 781032 8:The Registrar Cotton University College Hostel Road Dutta Baruah Bhawan Paanbazar Guwahati Assam 781001 9:The Registrar Gauhati University NH37 Gopinath Bordoloi Nagar Jalukbari Guwahati Assam 781014 ------------ Advocate for : MR. P MAHANTA Page No. # 3/3 Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. : Advocate ,appearing for 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, respectively. BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 09-12-2020 Heard Mr. R. B. Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. P. P.
Dutta, learned counsel representing the Assam Public Service Commission for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Also heard Mr. N. Dutta, learned Amicus Curiae. On instructions, Mr. Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not willing to press this writ petition. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed being not pressed. The interim order, if any, passed earlier in favour of the petitioners stands vacated/recalled. The common orders passed earlier in this writ petition shall now form part of the orders in WP(C) Nos. 3341/2019, 3344/2019 and 3368/2019 and the other connected matters. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.