HARISHANKAR S/O SHRI BHERULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-10. HARISHANKAR S/O SHRI BHERULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:50804] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15099/2024 1. Harishankar S/o Shri Bherulal, R/o Zorawarpura, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota (Raj. ) (At Present Confined In District Jail Kota). 2. Jagdish S/o Shri Bherulal, R/o Zorawarpura, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota (Raj. ) (At Present Confined In District Jail Kota). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, P. P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 10/12/2024 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 259/2024 registered at Police Station Khatoli, District Kota Rural for offences u/S 126(2), 115(2), 110 & 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the case diary. 4.
It is revealed that this is a case of free fight which arose all of sudden because of some hot talks between both the parties. There are cross cases between both the parties. Both the parties have sustained injuries and it has also come on record that the the accused-petitioners have also sustained injuries. [2024:RJ-JP:50804] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15099/2024] 5. On perusal of the case diary, it is found that the injuries sustained by the complainant party by a blunt weapon. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor is also given out that all the injuries sustained by the complainant party are caused by a blunt weapon, out of which, there is only one grievous injury sustained by the complainant party. 7.
Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact as stated by the learned Public Prosecutor is that there is one grievous injury sustained by the complainant party and all the injuries caused by a blunt weapon and so also the fact that the accused-petitioners have also sustained injuries in the incident allegedly took place and they are in custody since 21. 11. 2024, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.
50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J YOGESH KUMAR/309
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.