NANDEIBAM BOSE SINGH v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-11-29. NANDEIBAM BOSE SINGH v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
1-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 795 of 2024 with MC (WP(C)) No. 699 of 2024 Nandeibam Bose Singh … Petitioner -Versus- State of Manipur & 3 Ors … Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA 29. 11. 2024 Heard Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate and Ms. O. Momota, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Themreichan, learned counsel for the MPSC. The petitioner, who is an Information Technology Officer in the Rural Engineering Department, approached this Court that the Proposal dated 14. 1. 2019 proposing the post of ITNO in the pay scale of Rs. 15,600-39,100 GP-6,600/- has not been implemented by the State respondents. However, recently the Special Secretary, RD&PR, Government of Manipur issued an order dated 31. 07. 2024 formulating a Committee to examine the proposed Recruitment Rule of Assistant Engineer IT in the RED.
The grievance of the petitioner is that in the proposed Committee, earlier proposal dated 14. 1. 2019 is not included. Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate submits that the petitioner has no locus to challenge the validity of the Committee formulated vide order dated 31. 07. 2024 for examining the proposed RR for Assistant Engineer in the RED. At this stage, Mr. Rendy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to submit detailed representation to the authority for considering his case by the Committee constituted vide order dated 31. 07. 2024. Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate and Ms. O. Momota, learned senior counsel for the MPSC have no objection. Recording the submissions made at the Bar, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a detailed representation to the authority in this regard, if so advised. Misc case also stands disposed of. Furnish a copy of this order to learned counsel for the parties.
If the representation as prayed for is submitted to the authority, the same may be disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation. This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. JUDGE Priyojit Digitally signed RAJKUMA by RAJKUMAR R PRIYOJIT PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2024. 12. 02 SINGH 09:55:47 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.