BIMLI DEVI ALIAS BIMLA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-12. BIMLI DEVI ALIAS BIMLA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7065 of 2025 1. Bimli devi @ Bimla Devi, age 37 years, wife of Lalan Gupta 2. Kunti Kunwar, age 64 years, wife of Aliyar Sav 3. Saroj Devi @ Rachna Kumari, age 28 years, wife of Aliyar Sah 4. Shivpujan Saw @ Shivpujan Prasad, age 32 years, son of Basdev Saw All resident of Village Ward No. 9, Chapakali, P. O. Dol, P. S. Chiniya, District- Garhwa … Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shanti Kuwar, W/o Late Kodu Sao, R/o Village Chapakali, P. O. & P. S. Chiniya, District- Garhwa … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A. P. P. (Through VC) ----- 02/12. 12. 2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State appearing through Video Conferencing. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.
271/2024, registered for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the IPC, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, st 1 Class, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that for the alleged occurrence, Chiniya P. S. Case No. 62/2020 was registered, which was investigated by the police and final form has been submitted disclosing the death of the victim due to illness. He further submits that on the protest petition, the learned Court has been pleased to call upon the petitioners to face the trial. He draws attention of the Court to the submission made by the learned P. P. , who was opposing the anticipatory bail petition before the learned Sessions Judge and submits that this fact has also been admitted by the learned P. P. , however, the learned Court has been pleased to take -1- A. B. A. No. 7065 of 2025 cognizance against the petitioners.
He next submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents, as disclosed in paragraph 10 of this application. 4. Learned counsel for the State appearing through Video Conferencing opposed the prayer and submits that the learned Court has issued summon against the petitioners considering the materials on record. 5. It transpires from the impugned order passed by the learned Sessions Judge that in para 30,31, 37,38 and 39 of the case diary, the cause of death of the alleged victim is said to be illness and on protest petition, the learned Court has been pleased to take cognizance against the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedents. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.
Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like st amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 Class, Garhwa in connection with Complaint Case No. 271/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) th Dated: 12 December, 2025 Ajay/ -2- A. B. A. No. 7065 of 2025
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.