DINESH KUMAR BHAGAT ALLIAS DINESH BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-03. DINESH KUMAR BHAGAT ALLIAS DINESH BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 1168 of 2024 ---- Dinesh Kumar Bhagat @ Dinesh Bhagat, aged about 41 years, S/o Hari Kishan Bhagat, R/o Bhandaridih, P. O. & P. S. Mahagama, District Godda, at present House No. 136, Gali-12A, Maruti Kunj Bhondsi, P. O. & P. S. Gurugram, Haryana …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nikki Kumari, W/o Dinesh Kumar Bhagat 3. Anchal Kumari, D/o Dinesh Kumar Bhagat 4. Ayush Kumar, S/o Dinesh Kumar Bhagat (O. P No. 3 & 4 are minor and they are represented through their mother namely, Nikki Kumari, W/o Dinesh Kumar Bhagat) All are R/o Village Bhandaridhi, P. O. & P. S. Mahagama, District Godda …. …. Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Md. Faiyaj Alam, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A. P. P. ----rd 03/Dated: 03 December, 2024 1. Heard the parties. 2. Present criminal revision application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 30. 06.
2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda in Original Maintenance Case No. 97 of 2018 under Section 125 of the Cr. P. C, whereby, maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month has been awarded to the wife and Rs. 5,000/- per month each has been awarded to the minor son and daughter. 3. It appears that the parties are related with marriage and the marriage has been solemnized on 22. 06. 2005 as per Hindu Rites and Rituals. They have been blessed with two children. It also appears that the allegation of adultery has been made against the wife and a petition for divorce has also been filed. 4. The Family Court has framed the issue and has considered all the evidence brought on record by the parties and finding has been recorded that the wife has a reasonable reason to reside separately. The income of the revisionist has been assessed as Rs. 80,000/- per month. 5. Considering the above parameters, meagre amount Rs. 10,000/- per month has been awarded to the wife and Rs.
5,000/- per month each to the minor son and daughter. 6. I do not find any reason to entertain the present criminal revision application. Accordingly, the same is hereby, dismissed. 7. Pending Interlocutory Application No. 11838 of 2024 which has been filed for condoning the delay in preferring the present criminal revision also stands dismissed. (Rajesh Kumar, J. ) Raja/- Uploaded 2. Criminal Revision No. 1168 of 2024
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.