SHRI NAGOUDA BABURAO PATIL v. SMT SHOBHTAI @ SHWETA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-08-21. SHRI NAGOUDA BABURAO PATIL v. SMT SHOBHTAI @ SHWETA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 100245 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100245 OF 2024(PAR/POS) BETWEEN: SHRI NAGOUDA BABURAO PATIL AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC RETIRED MILITARY, R/O NAGANUR. K. S. , TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANTOSH. B. MALLIGAWAD & SRI. SHRIDHAR HIREMATH. , ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT SHOBHTAI @ SHWETA W/O SADANAND PATIL, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD/AGRICULTURE, R/O NAGANUR. K. S. , TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R NOW RESIDING AT SULAKUF, TALUK: KAGAL, Location: HIGH DISTRICT: KOLHAPUR, STATE: MAHARASHTRA. COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. SHRI. BHIMAGOUNDA BABURAO PATIL AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, OCC: RETIRED MILITARY, R/O: NAGANUR, K. S. , TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 2 - RFA No. 100245 of 2024 ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. When the matter is listed before the Court, and is called out, the advocate must be present in the Court. His or her absence may effect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 01. 08. 2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. However, in the interest of justice and as a last chance, finally two weeks time was granted to comply office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non compliance of office objections’ on 21. 08. 2024. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The appellant has not respected the Court order. As already noted above, when the matter is called, today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either - 3 - RFA No. 100245 of 2024 personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No. : 1 Sl No. : 29
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.