Mir Mohammed Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-23. Mir Mohammed Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,. Read the...
Judgment text
[ 3300 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 1011 OF 2017 Between: It/ir Mohammed Ali Khan, S/o. Mir Azizuddin Ali Khan, Age about 32yrs, Occ Business R/o H. No 5-8-454 to 456, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyd-erabad, Telahgana. .. ,PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Hyderabad 2. The Transport Commissioner, Regional Transport Authority, Hyderabad, 3. The Assistant Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Hyderabad, West Zone. 4. The Motor Vehicle lnspector, Regional Transport Autho rity, Hyderabad, West Zone 5. The Additional Registering Authority, Regional Transport Authority, Hyderabad, Central Zone. 6. The Deputy Director, Kanwal Tiger Reserve, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 7. The T. S.
Forensic Science Laboratory, Red Hills, Hyderabad, rep. by its Director. (R7 is impleaded as per C. O. dl. 7-3-17) ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the actions of Respondent No. 3 in issuing [\/emo No. 1566/HW12016 dated 1B-12-2016 calling ,the Petitioner to produce the vehicle for inspection, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principal of natural justice and contrary to Article 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and -r consequently direct the Respondents to rectify the duplication of the Petitioners vehicle number to other vehicle following due process of law. I. A. NO: 1 OF 2017 (WPMP.
NO: 1 117 0F 20171 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased direct the Respondents not to interfere or seize the vehicle Eicher van bearing '17EC8B167371 and No. AP 04 W 4272 (Goods Vehicle) bearing Chassis No. Engine No. E483CD88184696 used by the Petitioner pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MIRZA SAFIULLA BAIG (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: ORDER I 'l -7 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. lOll of 2OL7 ORDER: When the writ petition u,as called on 16. 72. 2024 , there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence, it was directed to be listed on 23. 12. 2024 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, therc' is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S TION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI MIRZA SAFIULLA BAIG, Advocate. [OPUC] 2. lrwo CCs to GP FOR TRANSPORT, High Court for the State of Telangana' tourl 3. Two CD Copies. BSK w HIGH COURT NBK,J DATED:2311212024 STATE 1 q 2[i: o ttB 13 o c. * ^--. r^-Ct-' ORDER WP. No. 1011 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS G. d"\ Pr- {#
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.