JOE JOSEPH, v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-29. JOE JOSEPH, v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. TH MONDAY, THE 29 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 23289 OF 2024 PETITIONER: JOE JOSEPH, AGED 44 YEARS SON OF K. V. JOSEPH, THANAKANDATHIL HOUSE, VETTUVENI, HARIPAD, KARTHIKAPPILLY, ALAPPUZHA- 690514, NOW RESIDING AT THANAKANDATHIL, CHETHIPUZHA, CHANGANACHERRY, INDUSTRIAL NAGAR, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686106 BY ADVS. DENIZEN KOMATH DEAN DENIZEN KOMATH MEGHA MADHAVAN RAMZY BIN O. A. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001 2 TAHZILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683101 3 VILLAGE OFFICER, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683589 OTHER PRESENT: SMT,PREETHA K. K. , SR. GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29. 07. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J ========================== W. P(C) No.
23289 of 2024 ========================== th Dated this the 29 day of July, 2024 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, stated to be the owner of the property having an extent of 4. 01 Ares of land comprised in Survey Nos. 355/11-2 and 356/7-3-2 of Aluva Taluk, in Nedumbassery Village in Ernakulam District, has preferred Ext. P7 application under Form-6 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008, (for short, the Act and the Rules) seeking change of user of the property in the data bank. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on the statutory application so far. rd 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3 respondent Village Officer to give sufficient inputs required under the Act and the Rules st to the 1 respondent Revenue Divisional Officer or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of the Act, within two months from today.
On receipt st of the same, the 1 respondent Revenue Divisional Officer/authorised officer will consider Ext. P7 application within three months thereafter and pass orders strictly in terms of the Act and the Rules. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. JUDGE mus APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23289/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT,DATED 2. 12. 2022 EXHIBIT-P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING NUMBER 2955/08 OF CHENGAMANAD SRO ,DATED 8. 05. 2008 EXHIBIT-P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO. 5 DATED 03. 12. 2022 EXHIBIT-P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO. 29438/2023 DATED 08. 09. 2023 EXHIBIT-P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29. 05. 2024 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT-P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN CON. CASE(C) NO. 1198/2024 ,DATED 12. 06. 2024 EXHIBIT-P7 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF FORM NO.
6 APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT,DATED 5. 06. 2024.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.