BRIJ KISHOR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-24. BRIJ KISHOR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 24 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1522 of 2024 BETWEEN:- BRIJ KISHOR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAM SWAROOP SHARMA, AGED-65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIED FROM THE POST OF TIME KEEPER R/O VILLAGE EKHARA POST GURIKHA, TEHSIL GOHAD DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI S. S. RAWAT- ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR M. P. TRIFAC, 16A SECOND FLOOR SADMAP BHAWAN ARERA HILLS BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IIDC PLAZA 39-A CITY CENTER GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. COMMISSIONER REGIONAL EMPLOYEE PR O V I D E N T FUND -2 SANJAY COMPLEX GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VIVEK KHEDKAR- AAG FOR THE STATE AND SHRI R. K.
GOYAL- ADVOCATE ) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 25-Jan-24 4:58:52 PM Shri R. K. Goyal, standing counsel for respondent no. 4 is directed to take notice on behalf of respondent no. 4 The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred seeking following reliefs: i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct to the respondent competent authority to revise the pension of the petitioner according with law and also grant the arrear with the 12% PA. ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct to the respondent competent authority to decide the petitioner representations annexure P/5 by speaking and reasoned order. iii) That, other relief doing justice including cost be ordered.
A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner that if the directions are issued to the respondent/authority to consider his fresh representation, his grievance would be redressed. Per contra, learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State has submitted that if the petitioner files a fresh detailed representation then the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law within a time bound period. Looking to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation along with all relevant documents before the respondent/authority and with the direction to the Competent Authority to decide the claim (representation) of the petitioner, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With aforesaid directions, present petition stands disposed of.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 25-Jan-24 4:58:52 PM E-copy/certified copy as per rules. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE Chandni Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 25-Jan-24 4:58:52 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.