SAJITH v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-14. SAJITH v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. R. RAVI MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(Crl. ). No. 298 OF 2020 PETITIONER: SAJITH, AGED 37 YEARS S/O. SASIDHARAN, THANNETHU PUTHENVEEDU, VAALIYOD P. O. , KOLLAM - 691520. BY ADVS. SRI. M. KIRANLAL SRI. MANU RAMACHANDRAN SRI. T. S. SARATH SRI. R. RAJESH (VARKALA) SHRI. SAMEER M NAIR RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KERALA STATE (LAW AND ORDER), POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004. 2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF/SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 612. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANDANMEDU POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 551. 4 RARICHAN, KOCHUKARUTHEDATHU, 6TH MILE STONE, CHAKKUPALLAM P. O. , PEERMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 509. 5 REGIN, S/O. RARICHAN, KOCHUKARUTHEDATHU, 6TH MILE STONE, CHAKKUPALLAM P. O. , PEERMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 509. WP(Crl. ). No.
298 OF 2020 2 6 TINU VERGHEESE, KOCHUKARUTHEDATHU, 6TH MILE STONE, CHAKKUPALLAM P. O. , PEERMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 509. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K. B. RAMANAND THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl. ). No. 298 OF 2020 3 JUDGMENT K. Vinod Chandran, J. The petitioner is aggrieved with the alleged th illegal detention of his wife. The 4 respondent th th is the father, 5 respondent is the brother and 6 respondent is the sister-in-law of the alleged detenue. The petitioner submits that after five months of their marriage she was taken by respondents 4 to 6 from the Airport in good faith. It is the submission that the parents promised that his wife will be brought back within a week, but she has not returned. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader submits that there was a man-missing case registered by the petitioner as Ext. P2 before the Kumali Police Station.
Parties were summoned to the Kumali Police station and the wife of the WP(Crl. ). No. 298 OF 2020 4 petitioner submitted that she is no longer interested in continuing the relationship. It is further submitted that there was a divorce petition filed by the alleged detenue, which is pending. We do not find any instance of illegal detention arising in this case. In such circumstances, we do not find any reason to invoke the extra-ordinary jurisdiction by issuance a writ of habeas corpus. The above writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge. Sd/- T. R. RAVI, Judge. sp/14/12/2020 //True Copy// P. A. To Judge WP(Crl. ). No. 298 OF 2020 5 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF SUB REGISTRAR DATED 29. 05. 2020. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED TO STATE POLICE CHIEF DATED 18. 11. 2020.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS EVIDENCING THE DISPATCH OF COMPLAINTS TO JURISDICTIONAL POLICE DATED 18. 11. 2020.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.