Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt. M. Nagamani, v. Sri Mangu Laxmi Narsimham,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-04. Smt. M. Nagamani, v. Sri Mangu Laxmi Narsimham,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 3443 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, Aggrieved by the Order dated 17. 04. 2017 passed in lA No. 7912017 in OS No. 59 of 2016' on the file of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. Between: 1. Smt. M. Nagamani, Wo. tate M. Laxmaiah, aged about 56 years, Occ: House wife, 2. Sri M. Jagan Mohan, s/o. Iate M. Laxmaiah, aged about 42 years, occ: Business, 3. Sri M. Madan Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ: Employee, 4. Sri M. Vijay Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 38 years, occ: Business, 5. Sri M. Murali Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 37 years, Occ: Advocate, All are R/o. H. No. 12-10. 4O7t27, East Namalagundu, secunderabad . PETITIONERS/PETIT! ONERS/PLAI NTIFFS AND Sri Mangu Laxmi Narsimham, S/o late V. en-kalaiah ag9.

d about 60 years, Occ: {. Retd Eriployee R Ramakrishna NagarBagh Amberpet, Hyderabad ... RESPONDENT'RESPON DENT/DEFENDANT CRPMP. NO:3511 OF 2017 petition under Sect'ron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitkrn, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedingd lncluding trial of suit OS No. 59 of 2016 on the file of the court of Xlk Junior Clvil Judge,iity Civil Court, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for tlhe Petitioner: Sri. CH Siddhartha Sarma Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. Venkateshwar Varanasi (Not Present) Petitiott under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 17. 04. 2017 passed in lA No. 5212017 in OS No. 59/2016, on the file of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. Between: 1. Smt. Nl. Nagamani, Wo. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 56 years, Occ: House wife, 2. Sri M. Jagan Mohan, S/o. late M.

Laxmaiah, aged about 42 years, Occ: Businerss, 3. Sri M. Madan Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ: Emplcyee, a. Sri lr4. Vijay Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 38 yearc, occ: Businr:ss, 5. Sri M. Murali Mohan, S/o. late M. Laxmaiah, aged about 37 years, Occ: \ Advocate, i ; I All an: R/o. H. No. 12-10-407127, East Namalagundu, Secunderabad ... PETITIONERS'RESPO NDENTS'PLAINTIF FS NNT' Mlngu Laxmi Narsimham, S/o late M. Venkataiah aged about 60 years, Occ: Qri Retd Employee R Ramakrishna Nagar Bagh Arnberpet. Hyderabad ... RESPO N DENT/PETITIONER/DEFENDANT CRPMP. NO: 3513 OF 2017 Petiton under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including trial of suit OS. No. 59 of 2016 on the file of the court of Xl)( Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of (livil the above Revision Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. CH Siddhartha Sarma counsel for the Respondent : sri. venkateshwar varanasi (Not present) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT}'OR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA A'I'IIYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SIU JIJSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C. R. P. Nos. 2666 & 2668 of 2017 t'rtr DECEMBER 2025 Between: Smt. M. Nagamani and four others ... Petitioners AND i I l Sri Mangu Laxmi Narsimham ... Respondcrrt COMMON ORDER: Today when these rrratters have come up before this Court for hearing, learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the cause in tlres;c Civil Revision Petitions docs not survive and has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the revis;ion petitioners, these Civil Rcvision Petitions are dismissed as infmctuous. Tl'rert; shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous pctitions, tf any are pending, shall stand closed SD'. K. AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPY" SECTION OFFICER I To 1.

The XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad 2. One CC to SRl. Ch Siddhartha Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. Enkateshwar Varanasi, Advocate iOpUCl 4. Two CD Copies PR/PSL +fi- HIGH COURT DATED i 04112t202s 1'r{E S I <. c t_) COMMON ORDER ,ii7fi z. 0 / r,lR CRP. N0S. 2666 AND 2668 0F 2017 * * DISMISSING THE CRP'S AS INFRUCTUOUS

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.