Skip to main content
LawSphereX

D.Issac v. Union of India

Court: Madras High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

Judgment date:

Case summary

Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-12-08. D.Issac v. Union of India. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Review Appln. (Writ). No. 41 of 2023 --------------------------------------------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08. 12. 2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. (Writ) No. 41 of 2023 D. Issac ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Union of India, Rep. by Flag Officer, Commander-in-Chief Head Quarters, Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Naval Officer-in-Charge (TN&P), Navy Office, Port Complex, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Review Application has been filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order dated 10. 02. 2023 passed in W. P. No. 17038 of 2022 and re-open the Writ Petitions for hearing on merits and allow the same on merits. For Petitioner : Mr. K. Karthikeyan For Mr. R. Maheswari ******* ---------------- Page No. :1/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Review Appln. (Writ). No.

41 of 2023 --------------------------------------------- O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J. ) The Review Application has been instituted to review the order dated 10. 02. 2023 made in W. P. No. 17038 of 2022. 2. The Division Bench of this Court has elaborately concluded the issue on merits, while confirming the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the review petitioner. The grounds raised in the present Review Application would show that an attempt has been made to re-adjudicate the merits. Expansion of scope of Review Application is impermissible and only in the event of establishing error apparent on record, the review is maintainable. 3. Consequently, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S. M. S. , J. ) (C. K. , J. ) 08. 12. 2025 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No ---------------- Page No. :2/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Review Appln. (Writ). No.

41 of 2023 --------------------------------------------- To: 1. Flag Officer, Union of India, Commander-in-Chief Head Quarters, Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Naval Officer-in-Charge (TN&P), Navy Office, Port Complex, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 009. ---------------- Page No. :3/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Review Appln. (Writ). No. 41 of 2023 --------------------------------------------- S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C. KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa Review Appln. (Writ) No. 41 of 2023 08. 12. 2025 ---------------- Page No. :4/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis

Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.