BALAKRISHNA. G v. Y. H. VENKATESH
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: ANU SIVARAMAN,VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-02-19. BALAKRISHNA. G v. Y. H. VENKATESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CCC No. 958 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 958 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. BALAKRISHNA G AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O LATE K GOIVNDASWAMY NAIDU 2. SMT. K NEELA W/O LATE K GOVINDA SWAMY NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SMT. G NETHRAVATHI W/O T. SHIVAIAH NAIDU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS Digitally signed by 4. T. SHIVAIAH NAIDU ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM S/O T. CHINNABBA NAIDU HIGH COURT OF AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS KARNATAKA ALL THE COMPLAINANTS ARE RESIDING AT NO. 29/A 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS RANGAPPA LAYOUT BSK STAGE 3, BENGALURU-560085. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. OMKAR BASAVA PRABHU. , ADVOCATE) - 2 - CCC No. 958 of 2024 AND: 1. Y. H. VENKATESH THE SUB-REGISTRAR JAYANAGAR DISTRICT (KENGERI) 2ND FLOOR, MYSORE ROAD KENGERI, BANGALORE-560 060. 2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF STAMP AND REGISTRATION VIDHAN SOUDHA BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. PROFORMA RESPONDENT …ACCUSED (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K S, AGA FOR PROFORMA R2 & A1) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYS THAT TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT ON 19. 07. 2024 IN WP NO. 10383/2024 (GM-ST/RN). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - CCC No. 958 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) 1. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 19. 07. 2024 passed in W. P. No. 10383/2024. The operative portion of the order reads as under; "11. In the result the following; ORDER (1) Petition is hereby allowed. (ii) The impugned Endorsement at Annexure- A dated 22.
03. 2024 is hereby quashed. st (iii) The 1 respondent-Sub Registrar is directed to register the sale certificate at Annexure-B dated 20. 03. 2024 executed by respondent No. 3 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (iv) Alternatively, in the event the petitioners do not pay the requisite stamp duty on the sale certificate, st the 1 respondent Sub-Registrar is directed to make an Entry of the Sale Certificate dated 20. 03. 2024 in favour of the petitioners in Book No. 1 and in all - 4 - CCC No. 958 of 2024 official records by filing a copy within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (v) It is made clear that all acts, deeds and things done by the parties pursuant to the present order shall be subject to final outcome of T. S. A. No. 5/2024 and W. P. No. 19356/2019 and all rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.
nd (vi) Liberty is reserved in favour of the 2 respondent - ED to take necessary steps in accordance with law. (vii) By way of an interim arrangement, the petitioners are directed not to alienate the subject property for a period of three months from today. " 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the accused submits that the affidavits are filed on 30. 11. 2024 and 26. 11. 2025. The said affidavits clearly indicate that the complainant has not paid the stamp duty as ordered. Hence, the second portion of the - 5 - CCC No. 958 of 2024 order to enter the sale certificate in book No. 1 has been complied as evident from Annexure-R1. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant disputes the same and states that the sale consideration is not reflected in E. C. We are not agreeing with the said submission as there is no such direction in the order of the learned Single Judge.
Hence, contempt proceedings are dropped as there is no willful disobedience of the order of the learned Single Judge. 4. Notice issued to the accused shall stand discharged. 5. All contentions urged in the contempt petition are kept open. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE GH/List No. : 3 Sl No. : 58
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.