Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Sint Salina Sultan v. Mohd Mateen Ali

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: RENUKA YARA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-17. Sint Salina Sultan v. Mohd Mateen Ali. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 155 0F 2025 Petition under Articre 227 of the constitution of rndia, aggrreved by the order passed in cMA No. 65 oF 2021 dated 22nd october 2024, on the fire of the Learned lll Additionar chief Judge, city civir court thereby confirming the orders dated 22. 2. 2021, in rA No. 88 of 2o20 inos No. 1s4z of 202o onthe fire of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between: sint salina sultan, wo Mir Maqsood surtan, aged about 51 yrs, occ. Househord, R/o H. no. 16-8-650, New Malakpet, Hyderabad 36 ... PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND 1 Itrlohd Mateen Ali, S/o late Mohd Arshad Ali, Aged about 58 yrs, Occ. Business. R/o H. No. 16-2-51t8ta, Akbar Bagh, A/latakpet, Hyderabad 2. Mohd Raheemuddin, M S/o Mohd eamar Uddin, Aged about 54 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o H. NO.

16-g-201, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. 3. I\/ohd Faheem Uddin, S/o Mohd Raheem Uddin, Aged about 28 yrs, Occ,. Business, R/o H. NO. 16-€_20j, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. 4. Mohd Samluddin, S/o Mohd Raheem Uddin, a Aged aboui 24 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o H. NO_ 16-g-201 , Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section r 5'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant ad-interim injunction order thereby retraining the respondents, their men, agents, and persons claiming through and under them from interfering into the peacefur I possession of the petitioner in respect of the petition schedl e property in any illegal manner whatsoever, pending CRP . lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ I nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may t e pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.

S No 495 oI 2022 on (OS 542 12020 old) on the file of XXIV Addl Chief Judge, C. C. C. , Hyderabad, pending l lP Counsel for the Petitioner SRI. MOHAMMAD ADNAT\ Counsel for the Respondents: SRI IKRAM HUSSAIN MAI =EN The Court made the following: ORDER I IN 1, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD / THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIvIL REVISION PETITIO N No. 155 of2o25 17th DECE MBER 2025 Between: Mrs. Salma Sultan, Hyderabad. . . . Petitioner AND Mr. Mohd Mateen Ali, Hyderabad and others. Respondents ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision petition unconditionally. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Therefore, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pencling, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. 2.

The lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad fl 3, One CC to SRl. IVOHAMMAD ADNAN Advocate ;] [OpL,( 4. One CC to SRl. IKRAM HUSSATN MATEEN Advocate I )pUCl 5. Two CD Copies TUSA / I I l HIGH COURT DATED:1711212O25 \ \ 1Fl 5 T4 ( ( ( ) 4 ( jtit P \ 0 3 2tj7$ z ) () I ,. s .. ag,p-ggl# ORDER CRP. No. 155 ot 2O25 I. DISMISISNG THE C. R. P. AS WITH DRAWN. il' \ . - ---.. t-i,,a-;J;,,;-

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.