DASHRATH YADAV ALIAS AZAD JEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-10. DASHRATH YADAV ALIAS AZAD JEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9432 of 2020 ------ Dashrath Yadav @ Azad Jee … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 10. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over. In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Katkamdag P. S. Case No. 102 of 2018 (G. R. No. 2148 of 2018) registered under sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under section 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act and under section 17 of the C. L. A. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a supplier of arms. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and no recovery of any arms has been made from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06. 11. 2018 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 20 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S. D. J. M. , Hazaribagh, in connection with Katkamdag P. S. Case No. 102 of 2018 (G. R. No. 2148 of 2018) with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Sonu-Gunjan/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.