Skip to main content
LawSphereX

BALARI MARBANIANG v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.

Court: High Court of Meghalaya

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-07-15. BALARI MARBANIANG v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Serial No. 16 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 643 of 2025 Date of Decision: 15. 07. 2026 Miss Balari Marbaniang D/o Smti. Mondil Marbaniang Aged about 32 years R/o Sangshong Village, Mairang, Eastern West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Chief Secretary, Shillong. 2. Under Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Health & Family Welfare Department. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Eastern West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4. The Director of Health Service, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 5. District Medical and Health Officer, West Khasi Hills District, Nongstoin. 6. Sub-Divisional Officer, Health Engineer Wing, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. H. R. Nath, Adv. Ms. S. R. Marak, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. N. G. Shylla, Sr. GA Ms. Z. E. Nongkynrih, GA.

i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the last date i. e. 30-06-2026, Ms. Z. E. Nongkynrih, learned GA on behalf of the State respondents has submitted that as per instructions received, approval had been obtained for appointment of the writ petitioner to a suitable Grade III Post. 2. Today, Ms. Z. E. Nongkynrih, learned GA submits that the issuance of formal appointment orders is awaiting the receipt of police verification report with regard to the writ petitioner. 3. On these submissions, Mr. H. R. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the matter may be closed by directing that the appointment order be issued preferably within a period of four weeks. 4. Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of with a direction that if the police verification report is received, the appointment order should be issued preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter.

Judge

Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.