LawSphereX

Mohd. Abdul Razak Hussain v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: SUREPALLI NANDA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-24. Mohd. Abdul Razak Hussain v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

132s21 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREiALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13049 OF 2026 Between: Mohd. Abdul Razak Hussain, S/o. Gulam Hussain, (M/s. Super Binny Rice Mill, Proprietor) Aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Chinthal Cheruvu Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District. ... PETITIONER AND '1. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Civil Supplies Corporation, State of Telangana, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. 3. The Additional Collector (Civil Supplies), Sangareddy District. 4. The District Manager (Civil Suppties), Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 5. The District Supply Officer (Civil Supplies), Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 6. Deputy Tahsildar (Civil Supplies), Hathnoora, Sangareddy District. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Ariicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seizing the paddy from Petitioners rice mill i. e. M/s. Super Binny Rice Mill, Chinthal Cheruvu Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District, which was supplied under Custom Milling Rice scherne pursuant to the panchanama dated Ol 10412026 as illegal, null' void, arbitrary. l. A.

NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affldavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to permit the petitioner to mill and supply the CMR rice without shifting the custom milling paddy to other rice mills pursuant to the panchanama dated 0710412026, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 to 6: AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel forthe Respondent No. 2: SRI K:DEVENDER, SC FOR CIV|L SUPPLIES CORPORATION The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No. 13049 OF 2026 DAT 24. O4. 026 Between: Mohd. Abdul Razak Hussain ... Petitaoner And State of Telangana, Rep its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Respondents ORDER Heard Sri K.

Durga Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pteader for Civil Supplies appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 6 and Sri K. Devender, learned Standing Counset for Civil Supplies Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2. SN,J W. P. No. 13049 of 2026 2. The oetitioner aooroached the Court seekinq Draver as under: "... to issue an appropriate Writ older or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seizing the paddy from Petitioner's rice milli i. e. , M/s. Super Binny Rice Mill, Chithal Cheruvu Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District, which was supplied under Custom Milling Rice scheme pursuant to the panchanama dated 07. 04. 2026 as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and to pass such other appropriate orders as are deemed fit and proper in the interests of justice..... " 3.

The case of the oetitio ner in br ef as De the averments m de in th affidavi filed bv the oetitioner tn su port of the present writ Petiti onlsasu der:- The petitioner rice mill has been undertaking Custom Milling Rice (CMR) operations for the Government of Telangana since 2015. On 07. 04. 2026, the Deputy Tahsildar allegedly inspected the mill premises, and claimed to have found 505 bags of PDS rice inside the mill and 110 bags in an auto bearing No. TG08Vp431, and thereafter, the respondent authorities initiated proceedings under Section 6-4 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and seized the stock, and directed stoppage of milling operations. 5l{'J w. P. No. t3049 of 2026 Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached this court by filing the present writ petition. PER USED THE RECO D: A) T ereleva ntD ortionof the ord rof this Co rt dated20. 01. 2,J26 DA edinW. P. No . 160 of 2026 ts extracted hereunder: "3.

In view of the same, the seizure is set aside and the official respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to mill the seized paddy under the supervision of the concerned authority and supply the rice to respondent No. 2-Corporation as per the directions of respondent No. 2 within the stipulated period. " IS D N 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 20. 0t. 2026 passed in W. p. No. 1603 of 2026, and hence, the petitioner in the present writ petition is arso entifled for the same relief as extended to the petitioner in W. p. No. 1603 of 2026. l sN,l w. P. No.

13049 of 2026 5 ea d n lv a r b lf to 6a d learn ed Standi q Coun sel forCivil Suooli es r at e do not disDute the sai d submi ssionm de vt he r c a r e lf r 6 AKI GI TO ON D a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pteader for Civil Supplies appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. l, 3 to 6 and the learned Standing Counset for Civil Supplies Corporation appearing on behalfof respondent No. 2, c) The orders of this Court dated 20,. 0l-. 202fi passed in W. p. No. t6O3 of 2026 (referred to and extracted above) - tt SN,J w. P. No. 13049 of 2026 d) The discussion and conclusion as arrived at paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 of the present order, The wrt netition is dis ccd fl f n termc af the order of thi Court dated 2O. OL. 2O26 oassed in W. P. No. 1 603 of 2026 and the seizu dated 07. O4.

2026 is set aside and the official resoondents are directed to oermit the oetitioner to mill the seized 0 3 1 rth io n rn authoriw and supp lv the rice to resoondent No. 2- Coroorati on as Der the dir ions of resDon ent No. 2 within the stioulate oeriod. There shall be n order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. lr Sd/. P. C SULEKHA DEVI lt ISTANT REGISTRAR tI //TRUE COPY// I ECTION OFFICER I To, 1 The Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, S Hyderabad. 2 The Civil Supplies Corporation, State of Telangana, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. 3 The Additional Collector (Civil Supplies), Sangareddy District. 4 The District Manager (Civil Supplies), Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 5 The District Supply Officer (Civil Supplies), Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 6 Deputy Tahsildar (Civil Supplies), Hathnoora, Sangareddy District. 7 One CC to SRI K.

DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 9. Two CD Copies PMK @) -H# HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 2410412026 1l-iE s14 ORDER ,) 06ilAr 2020 ) 1 WP. No. 13049 of 2026 .? 1, '\:t * . Or: "i: j PAT]Y{ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.