Skip to main content
LawSphereX

TARA CHAND REPSAWAL AND ORS v. STATE AND ORS

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: DINESH MEHTA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-03. TARA CHAND REPSAWAL AND ORS v. STATE AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2025:RJ-JD:6520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1) S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6145/2017 1. Smt. Usha Saraswat, W/o Shri Rakesh Saraswat, Resident Of D-77, Shastri Nagar, Bikaner. 2. Smt. Gunjan Kulshreshtra W/o Shri Nitin Kumar Kulshreshtra, Resident Of 239, Patewa Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodana, Jaipur. 3. Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Ram Nath Sharma, Resident Of Village And Post Chhapura Kalan, Via Chhapura Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Sanskrit Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Shiv Dayal Sharma, Presently Working As Principal, Rajasthan Varisht Upadhyaya Sanskrit School, Bharatpur. 5. Smt.

Nirmala Sharma, Presently Working As Principal, Rajasthan Varisht Upadhyaya Sanskrit Vidhyalaya, Khori- Jaipur. 6. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Presently Working As Principal, Rajasthan Varisht Upadhyaya Sanskrit School, Bassinana- Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With (2) S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6143/2017 1. Tara Chand Repsawal S/o Shri Net Ram, Resident Of House No. 388, Kailash Puri, Bikaner. 2. Raj Singh S/o Shri Sukhdeva Ram, Resident Of War No. 30, Sadulpur, Churu, Rajasthan. 3. Ram Gopal Jat S/o Shri Ganga Sahay, Resident Of Village And Post Kalwaniyo Ka Bas, Tehsil Shahpura, Distt. Jaipur. 4. Chouthmal Dhobi S/o Shri Jaman Lal Dhobi, Resident Of House No. 469, Mohalla Sarvan, Village Manoharpur, Post Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, Distt. Jaipur. 5. Narendra Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Bahadur Singh, Resident Of Laksiwas, Post Maharajbas, Tehsil Behroad, Distt. Alwar. 6. Ravindra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Megh Singh, Resident Of 9/1244, Arya Sadan, Sonpura Road, Tilak Nagar, Bharatpur.

[2025:RJ-JD:6520] (2 of 3) [CW-6145/2017] 7. Phool Chand Verma S/o Shri Munga Ram Ji, Presently Residing At B-68, Vikas Nagar, Behind Hirapura Power House, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajathan. 2. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Sanskrit Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Hari Om Gautam, Presently Working As, Principal At Government Varishta Upadhyaya, Sanskrit Vidhyalaya, Bharatpur. 5. Kalyan Chand, Presently Working As Principal At Government Varishta Upadhyaya Sanskrit Vidhyalaya, Paota, Jaipur. 6. Satyanarayan Dadhich, Presently Working As Principal At Government Varishta Upadhyaya Sanskrit Vidhyalaya, Kota. 7. Shashi Kumar Sharma, Presently Working As Principal At Government Varishta Upadhyaya Sanskrit Vidhyalaya, Ramdeora, Jaisalmer.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Shreyansh Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Chandak, AAAG for Mr. B. L. Bhati, AAG JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 03/02/2025 1. Mr. Chandak, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submitted that by way of notification dated 28. 03. 2018, the Rajasthan Sanskrit Education State and Subordinate Service (School Branch) Amendment Rules, 2013 were promulgated and the relevant schedules appended to the RSES and Subordinate [2025:RJ-JD:6520] (3 of 3) [CW-6145/2017] (SR) Rules, 2015 have been amended and the impediment which the petitioners have been facing in the way of getting promotion, has finally been removed. 2. It is further informed that by way of orders dated 28. 07. 2023 (Order No. 19796-19802 and Order No. 19789-95), all concerned persons, including the petitioners have been given promotion. 3. Mr.

Bhandari, learned senior counsel submitted that some of the petitioners have retired and he is not in a position to state as to whether the promotion has been accorded to all the concerned persons or not. 4. While disposing of the present writ petitions as having become infructuous, the petitioners and all other concerned candidates are given a liberty to file a representation(s) before the Director, Sanskrit Education, Jaipur if promotion has not been given to him/her in terms of the notification dated 28. 03. 2018. 5. In case the representation(s) is/are filed by the petitioner(s), the respondents shall consider the same and in case such petitioner(s) is/are found eligible and entitled, due benefits of promotion shall be given even if they have retired. 6. The stay applications also stand disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 95-96-Arvind/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.