Sunil Paswan v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-12. Sunil Paswan v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83968 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -461 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sunil Paswan S/O Jagarnath Paswan Resident of Village- Chak Sikandar, Police Station- Bidupur, Distt. - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 12-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Rina Sinha, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Raja Pakar (Baranti) P. S. Case No. 461 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4), 305(A) of the B. N. S. S.
, 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that certain miscreants have committed theft in the house of the informant, and from his house, a mobile and Rs. 50,000/- were stolen. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a mobile was recovered from Bipin Rai. Bipin Rai has stated Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 83968 of 2025(2) dt. 12-12-2025 2/2 before the police that he has purchased the mobile from this petitioner. It has also been submitted that save and except this, nothing is against him. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31. 08. 2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases. 6.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raja Pakar (Baranti) P. S. Case No. 461 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.