HANS RAJ v. RIGZEN SAMPHAL AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2020-02-14. HANS RAJ v. RIGZEN SAMPHAL AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Sr. No. 5 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CPSW 489/2018 Hans Raj ..... Petitioner (s) Through :- None V/s Rigzen Samphal and others ..... Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Rajesh Thapa Dy. AG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDER 1 This is a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-compliance of order dated 11. 12. 2017 passed in SWP No. 2666/2017 whereby a direction was issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner on its merits in light of the representation and decide the same in accordance with rules. 2 On the last four consecutive dates of hearing, i. e. 12. 02. 2019, 15. 04. 2019, 07. 08. 2019 and 19. 09. 2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, nobody has come present on behalf of the petitioner.
3 From the conduct of the petitioner, it appears that either the respondents have complied with the order aforesaid and passed the requisite order or for some other reason, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this contempt petition. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the petitioner remained 2 CPSW 489/2018 unrepresented on the last four consecutive dates of hearing. In that view of the mater, proceedings in this contempt proceedings are closed. (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE Jammu 14. 02. 2020 Sanjeev Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR UPPAL 2020. 02. 14 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.