V.SURESH KUMAR, v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-03-17. V.SURESH KUMAR, v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP(C) NO. 34659 OF 2019 2025:KER:25058 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON TH MONDAY, THE 17 DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 34659 OF 2019 PETITIONER: V. SURESH KUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS, ADVOCATE, S/O. SIVARAMAN NAIR, VATTAPARAMBATH HOUSE, ARIMBUR P. O. , THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680620. BY ADVS. G. SANTHOSH KUMAR (P). SRI. V. R. SASSIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003. 2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS SECTION, PUZHAKKAL, CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR-680020. 3 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, P. W. D. ROADS SECTION, PUZHAKKAL, CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR-680020. 4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR-680020. 5 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-680002. 6 THRISSUR CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680001. WP(C) NO.
34659 OF 2019 2025:KER:25058 7 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL WING OF THRISSUR CORPORATION, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680001. 8 M/S. KUDROLI BUILDERS AND INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD, AJMAL ARCADE, CHERKALA P. O, KASARAGOD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, KASARAGOD-671541. BY ADVS. SRI. MILLU DANDAPANI ARUNKUMAR A SRI. SANTHOSH P. PODUVAL, SC, THRISSUR CORPORATION OTHER PRESENT: SRI T. JAYAN, GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17. 03. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 34659 OF 2019 2025:KER:25058 JUDGMENT Petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition complaining about the inordinate delay in completing the construction of Thrissur-Kanjani-Vadanappally Road. 2. Sri. G. Santhoshkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, points out that the road construction is almost over, and hence, this writ petition may be closed leaving open the various legal issues raised in this writ petition. 3.
Having heard the learned Standing Counsel for the th 5 respondent-Kerala State Electricity Board as well as respondents 6 and 7, I am of the opinion that this writ petition can be closed, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as above and making it clear that the various legal issues raised in this writ petition are left open for consideration in an appropriate manner. This writ petition is closed as above. Sd/- HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE Skk//24. 03. 2025 WP(C) NO. 34659 OF 2019 2025:KER:25058 APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 34659 OF 2019 PETITIONER’SXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12. 05. 2018 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER THE RTI ACT AND ITS REPLY DATED 08. 06. 2018 GIVEN BY THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE PRESENT POSITION OF THRISSUR-KANJANI-VADANAPPALLY ROAD. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 15. 11. 2019 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER AND ITS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT DATED 16. 11.
2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.