Smt. Mandha Anjamma v. The state of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-05-26. Smt. Mandha Anjamma v. The state of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF IVAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 7036 OF 2020 Between: Smt. IMandha Anjamma, W/o. Late l\rlaraiah, Aged About 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Narketpally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Nalgonda District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda District. 4 The Tahsildar, Narketpally Ir4andal, Nalgonda District. 5 The Panchayath Secretary, Narketpally, Nalgonda District. 6 The District Panchayath Officer, Nalgonda District. ,,.
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 interventions into the Petitioner's peaceful and enjoyment of land an extent of A. 0. 22 gts in Sy. No. 48l, Situated at Narketpally Revenue Village Shivar and l\/andal, Nalgonda District, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No, 2 to 4, not to intervention into the Petitioner's peaceful and enjoyment of land an extent of Ac. 0. 22 gts in Sy. No.
481, Situated at Narketpally Revenue Village, Shivar and lt4andal, Nalgonda District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5&6: The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrrLu,n with liberty as prayed for. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall st,rnd closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY // TRUE COPYII ^ REGISTRAR ( DrcrAL il) 00 fYtW SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3.
Two CD Copies Prk lu , a /.. HIGH COURT AARJ DATED:26/05/2020 1 l-, t: s14 ,c ( /'i 3 03 Jri;i2020 I ! t ,/ {e nr. cl^C ORDER WP. No. 7036 ot 2020 Dismissing the WP. as withdrawn without costs.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.