Bandi Chanakya v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-20. Bandi Chanakya v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
I \ 13257 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5450 OF 2024 Between: Bandi Chanakya, S/o. B. Venkateshwara Rao, Age 41 yrs, Occ: High Court Advocate. R/o. Flat No. 714, Sai Raghavendra Magnificent Habitat, Nallagandla, Hyderabad ... Petitioner/Accused AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. 2 G. V. Subbarao, S/o Satyanarayana Prasad, age 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o Flat No. 303, Sai Krishna Residency, Sai Saradhi Nagar, Hyderabad-500073. ... Res pon dents/De-facto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P . C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings in Crime No. 280 of 2024 Dt. 1810412024 on the file of Madhuranagar PS, Hyderabad. l. A.
NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No. 280 of 2024 Dt. 18. 04. 2024 on the file of lvladhuranagar PS, Hyderabad including arresUappearance of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. G V Bhagya Laxmi, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BI-E SM'I" JTISTICE . IUVVADI SRIDEVI I (]RIMINAI, PE TII'ION N0.
5450 of 2024 oIU)EIr: Whcn the m:rrrer is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Pr-rblic Prosecutor, on instrur:tions, that during the pendency ol'this petition, charge sheet is filed in the matter, and hence, this criminal petition filed for quashing the F. l. R, has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, this criminal petition is disnrissed as infructr-rous, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet, ifaggrieved. Pending rniscc'llaneous applications, if any, shall stand closcd. Sd/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ TION OFFICER To, 1. The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Madhura Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to M/s. G V Bhagya Laxmi, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies ADKigh u 1\ l1 t,i HIGH COURT DATED:2011212024 I c . :r-i ORDER !
) 'iiril 2ffi fr \ CRLP. No. 5450 of 2424 , -t DEspr't DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS Rg
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.