RIYA NANDA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-25. RIYA NANDA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH (116) CRM-M-54445-2025 Date of Decision:- 25. 09. 2025 25. 09. 2025 RIYA NANDARIYA NANDA ……Petitioner……Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ……Respondents……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAINALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Jagmohan Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jagmohan Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.
The present petition is for issuance of a direction to theThe present petition is for issuance of a direction to theThe present petition is for issuance of a direction to the respondents for registration of FIR for which the petitioner has alreadyrespondents for registration of FIR for which the petitioner has alreadyrespondents for registration of FIR for which the petitioner has alreadyrespondents for registration of FIR for which the petitioner has already moved a representation dated 10. 05. 2025 to respondent No. 4. moved a representation dated 10. 05. 2025 to respondent No. 4. moved a representation dated 10. 05. 2025 to respondent No. 4. 2.
After vehemently arguing on the merits of the case, learnedAfter vehemently arguing on the merits of the case, learnedAfter vehemently arguing on the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition withcounsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition withcounsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition withcounsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the Court of competent jurisdictionliberty to approach the Court of competent jurisdictionliberty to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction by invoking the by invoking the provisions of law including Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023. provisions of law including Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023. provisions of law including Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023. 3.
In light of the above, the present petition is dismissed asIn light of the above, the present petition is dismissed asIn light of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinionIt is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinionIt is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of themerits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of themerits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of themerits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner(s) and is not a direction. counsel for the petitioner(s) and is not a direction. counsel for the petitioner(s) and is not a direction.
(ALOK JAIN) September 25, 2025September 25, 2025 JUDGE manju Whether speakinWhether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.