Mohan v. State, rep .by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-11-25. Mohan v. State, rep .by the Inspector of Police,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Crl. O. P. No. 32108 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO. 32108 of 2025 Mohan ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Alangayam Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No. 156 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No. 156 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. Sakkarapani V. For Respondent : Mr. S. Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ****** 1/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 32108 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(C), 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024 in Crime No.
156 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 12. 11. 2025 at about 18:00 hours, while the respondent police conducted a prohibition raid near Kamarajar Nagar, they found that the petitioner herein was involved in illegal possession of 29 numbers of liquor bottles (each 180 ml) for the purpose of illegal sales for higher price; that on seeing the police, the petitioner fled away from the spot. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution; and that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, hence sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 32108 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.
Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has three previous cases of similar nature; and that the investigation of this case is pending. 5. Considering the submissions made on both sides, facts and circumstances of this case, gravity of offence, the previous antecedents of the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the investigation of the case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 25. 11. 2025 stn 3/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 32108 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. stn To 1. The Inspector of Police, Alangayam Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No. 156 of 2025) 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl. O. P. No. 32108 of 2025 25. 11. 2025 4/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.