Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SHIV SARAN SAW v. EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-02-10. SHIV SARAN SAW v. EXCISE DEPARTMENT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5032 of 2015 Shiv Saran Saw, son of Anup Sao resident of Barkakhana Bazar, P. O. Barkhana, P. S. Patratu, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Excise & Prohibition Department, Government of Jharkhand having his office at the Town Administrative Building, Near Gol Chakkar, Sector-3, Dhurwa, Ranchi 834004 2. The Jharkhand State Beverage Corporation Ltd. , a Government of Jharkhand Corporation registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at the T. A. Building, near Gol Chakkar, Dhurwa, Sector-3, P. O. & P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi through the Special Secretary, Excise & Prohibition Department-cum-Managing Director having his office at T. A. Building, near Gol Chakkar, Dhurwa, Sector-3, P. O. & P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3. The Secretary-cum-Excise Commissioner, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi having his office at the T. A.

Building near Gol Chakkar, Dhurwa, Sector- 3, P. O. & P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 4. The Special Secretary, Excise & Prohibition Department-cum-Managing Director, The Jharkhand State Beverage Corporation Ltd. having his office at the T. A. Building near Gol Chakkar, Dhurwa, Sector-3, P. O. & P. S. Dhurwa District Ranchi 5. The Manager, Ramgarh Depot of the Jharkhand Beverage Corporation Ltd. Ramgarh, P. O. & P. S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh ... ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Rohan Kashyap, Adv. A. C. to S. C. V ------th 05/Dated 10 February, 2020 Mr. Amitabh Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction from his client, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as the matter has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State has no objec-tion if permission is accorded. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) s. m.

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.