Davis Chabungbam and 9 Ors v. Delton Tayenjam and 3 Ors
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-11-29. Davis Chabungbam and 9 Ors v. Delton Tayenjam and 3 Ors. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 97-108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C) No. 549 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 158 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 190 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 214 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 333 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 334 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 476 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 61 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 103 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 190 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 254 of 2024 with WP(C) No. 433 of 2024 Davis Chabungbam & 9 Ors. ….. Applicant/s - Versus – Delton Tayenjam & 3 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 29. 11. 2024 [1] Heard Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Arunkumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. L. Somorendro Roy, learned counsel on behalf of the State respondent and Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner. [2] By the present application, the applicants are praying for replacing the word “petitioner” in last but one para of the order dated 24. 07. 2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.
103 of 2024 and the connected matters wherein this Court held that the appointment of the petitioner shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petitions. [3] It is stated that the word “petitioner” be replaced by applicants/private respondents and Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel for the applicants, submits that by replacing the word “petitioner” by applicants/private respondents, the nature of the order will not be changed and learned counsel for the other parties is also agreeable to the submissions of the learned senior counsel for the applicants. [4] Recording the submissions made at the bar and after perusing the materials on record, the word “petitioner” in last but one para of the order dated 24. 07. 2024 be read as applicants/private respondents. [5] With this observation, the application being MC(WP(C) No. 549 of 2024 is disposed of. [6] Mr. L.
Somorendro Roy, learned counsel for the State respondent, prays for two weeks’ time for filing counter affidavit in the writ petitions. [7] List the remaining matters on 13. 12. 2024. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring Digitally signed KH. by KH. JOSHUA JOSHUA MARING Date: 2024. 12. 03 MARING 15:03:14 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.