Dr. P.V.P.Sai Arun, v. The Station House Officer,
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: K MANMADHA RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-04-04. Dr. P.V.P.Sai Arun, v. The Station House Officer,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL . ' I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12239 OF 2016 , Between: 1. Dr. P. VP. Sai Arun, s/o P. B. Srinivas, Aged about; 30 years, occ Unemployee, r/o 1-730, Makkuva Road, Salur Post and Mandal Vizianagaram District 2. Dr. P. V. Sai Santosh Kiran, s/o P. B. Srinivas, Aged about: 27 years, Student, r/o 1-730, Makkuva Road Salur Post and Mandal, Vizianagaram District ... Petitioners AND 1. The Station House Officer, Salur Town PS, Salur, Vizianagaram District. 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police,, Salur Town PS, Salur, Vizianagaram District 3. The Superintendent of Police,, Vizianagaram District at Vizianagaram. 4. The Tahsildar, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 5. The Collector & District Magistrate,, Vizianagaram District at Vizianagaram. 6. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad Rep.
by its Principal Secretary. 7. Akhil Bharatiya Vikas Parishad, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District Rep. by its Vice-President - Sri Sangam Reddy Jayasimha. ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to F. I. R. No. 46, dated 08-03-2016 registering the case as Crime No. 46 under Sec. 417, 465, 460, 468, 471 of IPC and Sec. 12 of AP (SC', ST and BCs) Regulation of 4 issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 and Rules, 1997, registered in Salur Town Police Station, Salur, Vizianagaram District by respondents 1 and 2, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law, one without jurisdiction and the petitioners herein pray that the same may be quashed.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 circumstances stated in Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP. No. 15341/2016 in WP. No. 12239 of 2016 dt. 13-04-2016. lA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the writ petition as early for final disposal of the same in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 9 days in representing the above case in WP. SR No. 8 of 2018. I. A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP.
NO: 15341 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY the F. I. R. No. 46, dated 08. 03. 2016 registered in Salur Town Police Station, Salur, Vizianagaram District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 circumstances stated in Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to in the interest of receive the documents as Additional material Papers justice. I. A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 2472 OF 2016) circumstances stated in Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13-04-2016 in W. P. M. P. No. 15341/ 2016 in W. P. No. 12239 of 2016. Counsel for the Petitioner’s : SRI. M VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
1 to 3 & 6: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : GP FOR REVENUE (AP) Advocate Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 : SRI. J SATYA PRASAD, The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010826452016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12239/2016 Between: ... PETITIONER(S) Dr. P. v. p. sai Arun, and Others AND ... RESPONDENT{S) The Station House Officer and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. 15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. 6762/J SATYA PRASAD The Court made the following Order: also i. e. , on None appeared for the petitioners. On the earlier occasions on behalf of the 14. 03. 2024 & 28. 03. 2024, there was no representation not evincing any interest to petitioners.
So, it appears that the petitioners are prosecute their writ petition. No 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. KASIRAO achari ASSISTANT REGISTRAR i //TRUE COPY// ! / SE Qtl&OFFICER 1. One CC to SRI M VIDYASAGAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI J SATYA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC] ' KhU°UT? ' revenue (AP), High Court of Andhra 5. Three CD Copies GTS WP DB HIGH COURT DATED:04/04/2024 ORDER WP. No. 12239 of 2016 DISMISSING THE W. P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.