PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA v. M/S G B CHOWDHURY HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-04. PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA v. M/S G B CHOWDHURY HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010152962020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/2012/2020 PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA S/O- MOHAN LAL AGARWALA AND SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S RADHIKA EXPRESS SERVICE HAVING ITS OFFICE AT H. N. 12 H. P. BRAHMACHARI ROAD PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781008 ASSAM VERSUS M/S G B CHOWDHURY HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. Address - A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING THEIR REGISTERED OFFICE AT CHOWDHURY TILLA SARUMOTORIA OPPOSITE DISPUR CAPITAL COMPLEX GUWAHATI-708006 ASSAM REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR. 2:SUJATA GURUNG CHOWDHURY DIRECTOR OF M/S G B CHOUDHURY HOLDING PVT. LTD. W/O SHRI BIJOYANANDA CHOWDHURY R/O CHOWDHURY TILLA SARUMOTORIA OPPOSITE DISPUR CAPITAL COMPLEX GUWAHATI-708006 ASSAM 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 Page No. # 2/3 4:THE ASSAM STATE TEXTBOOK PRODUCTION AND PUBLICATION CORPORATION LTD.
PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 REP. BY ITS MANAGIG DIRECTOR 5:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM STATE TEXTBOOK PRODUCTION AND PUBLICATION CORPORATION LTD. PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ------------ Advocate for : MR K P PATHAK Advocate for : MR. N DEKA appearing for M/S G B CHOWDHURY HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. : Advocate , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively. BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM 04. 12. 2020 This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant seeking impleadment in the connected writ petition. Heard Mr. R Bora, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N Deka, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners and Mr. PN Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Textbook Publication, appearing for the opposite party Nos. 4 and 5. Mr. Bora, learned counsel for the applicant submits that his client is one of the tenderers in the NIT process which is under challenge in the present proceeding and therefore, he is a necessary party in this proceeding.
Page No. # 3/3 Mr. Deka, learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that he has no objection if the prayer for impleadment is allowed by this Court. In view of the above and having regard to the statements made in the application, I am of the view that the applicant should be impleaded in the connected writ petition as a respondent. Ordered accordingly. Registry to make necessary endorsement in the cause title of the writ petition. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.