RITU KHAJURIA v. G.A.QURESHI,DIR.SCHOOL EDUCATION
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-11-26. RITU KHAJURIA v. G.A.QURESHI,DIR.SCHOOL EDUCATION. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 11 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CPSW No. 109/2012 in SWP No. 2481/2011 Ritu Khajuria ….. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs G. A. Qureshi, DIR School Education . …. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER (26. 11. 2024) 1. The instant contempt petition has been filed for alleged non-compliance of order/judgment dated 27. 12. 2011 passed by this Court in the writ petition bearing SWP No. 2481/2011.
The operative part of the order/judgment is extracted hereunder: “In view of the controversy involved and having regard to the fact that the petitioner admittedly has filed representation before the concerned authority, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Director School Education, Jammu to deal with and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner, of course in accordance with the Rules, within four weeks from the date a copy of this order is made available to him. Petitioner may, if so advised, hand over copy of the writ petition and copies of all its annexures to the respondent No. 3, filed in order to reinforce her claim, to facilitate early disposal of the matter. This order shall not come in the way of the petitioner to work out her remedies in the event, she is not satisfied with the outcome of the representation. ” 2 CPSW No. 109/2012 2. Mr.
Raman Sharma, learned AAG appearing for the respondent has placed reliance on the statement being made by the petitioner in writing that she is presently discharging her duties at MS Nardhani Nandwal and is satisfied with the present place of posting. The petitioner has also stated that she does not want to pursue with the present contempt petition. Her certificate is taken on record. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, nothing survives in the instant contempt petition. 4. The contempt proceedings initiated against the respondent are closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court, if cause survives. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE JAMMU 26. 11. 2024 Shivalee Whether the order is speaking: Yes/ No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No Shivalee Khajuria 2024. 11. 27 13:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.